17 comments

[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 57.2 ms ] thread
Interesting to see the original Yahoo! reinvented this way.
(comment deleted)
What's the rule for adding something to this? It seems like they're all links to github repositories that consist entirely of lists, but is it acceptable to link to an awesome resource within a repository?
If you did that, then it would no longer be a list of lists, it would be a list of resources.
Go add your awesome thing to a list this references.
Create a list of awesome-resources and add your list to this list.
I'm kind of tempted to fork this, parse the text into a data format (such as CSV), and then write a script to fetch Github stats for each list, particularly last commit time, number of commits, number of contributors, and # of stars...it probably took a lot of time to gather all these links...but a massive list of links with not much differentiation (until you click through) ends up being a limited resource...but it's just a few steps from being something that's easier to filter and categorize.

Edit: Maybe I'll work on it this weekend...half-hoping OP just has it in a spreadsheet and is generating the list from that...

(comment deleted)
Github should ship something in order to replace this lists/awesome/best etc. This should be replaced by explore feature.
I am happy to see a link to the list itself is contained within the list. I can have a sound sleep.
I will have a bad night. It should be split into a list of lists that contain themselves, and a list of lists that don't.