When I first saw this post, it was #3 on /r/Bitcoin. With 81% upvotes, it had 122 points. When I refreshed the page a few minutes later it was gone.
A sad state of affairs on /r/Bitcoin, where the moderators have decided that the unresolved block size issue should not be discussed anymore.
The current temporary rules of /r/Bitcoin state:
> Can I still talk about hard fork proposals on /r/Bitcoin? Right now, not unless you have something really new and substantial to say.
This post is not discussing a hard fork, it's discussing members of the Bitcoin Core team by name. Nonetheless, I'd say the accusations--whether true or not--are new and substantial. The community deserves to see this post and judge it as they will.
1 comment
[ 6.7 ms ] story [ 15.2 ms ] threadA sad state of affairs on /r/Bitcoin, where the moderators have decided that the unresolved block size issue should not be discussed anymore.
The current temporary rules of /r/Bitcoin state:
> Can I still talk about hard fork proposals on /r/Bitcoin? Right now, not unless you have something really new and substantial to say.
This post is not discussing a hard fork, it's discussing members of the Bitcoin Core team by name. Nonetheless, I'd say the accusations--whether true or not--are new and substantial. The community deserves to see this post and judge it as they will.