My take - it's a growing pain for secret service.
My approach - take it out at source/planning/chatter stage.
When drone is up in the air at alternative controlled frequency or purely auto controlled with or without GPS - it's a bit too late.
There must be ways this is already covered. I'd be surprised if the president does not already have some level of protection from a mortar being fired where he is due to speak. There must be some kind of mobile in-air intercept method for smaller objects.
Perhaps mini missiles or those gattling guns they have on navy ships. The SS must be able to afford a few vans with these mounted around a perimeter. I just googled mortar defence and they are working on lasers that can stop these in air too.
4 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 20.2 ms ] threadThese devices are used at film sets and important buildings which makes it probable that they are a measure to protect the president.
It is an issue.
Perhaps mini missiles or those gattling guns they have on navy ships. The SS must be able to afford a few vans with these mounted around a perimeter. I just googled mortar defence and they are working on lasers that can stop these in air too.
Source: I know nothing.