[–] jcr 11y ago ↗ discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10064276 [–] tzs 11y ago ↗ Just to be clear, that is discussion of the Batteriser itself and the EEVBlog debunking of it.This new submission is not about the Batteriser, but rather about the reaction of Batteriser fans to the debunking. [–] jcr 11y ago ↗ Thanks. There was a flurry of dupe or near-dupe "Batteriser" submissions, and it seems I misread this one.
[–] tzs 11y ago ↗ Just to be clear, that is discussion of the Batteriser itself and the EEVBlog debunking of it.This new submission is not about the Batteriser, but rather about the reaction of Batteriser fans to the debunking. [–] jcr 11y ago ↗ Thanks. There was a flurry of dupe or near-dupe "Batteriser" submissions, and it seems I misread this one.
[–] jcr 11y ago ↗ Thanks. There was a flurry of dupe or near-dupe "Batteriser" submissions, and it seems I misread this one.
3 comments
[ 71.8 ms ] story [ 376 ms ] threadThis new submission is not about the Batteriser, but rather about the reaction of Batteriser fans to the debunking.