Indeed, although there is some risk they'll come after you for trade secrets or espionage or copyright or whatever. If you can find out where the line is beforehand, maybe you won't cross it. It seems they were heading towards agreement, with only a few things deemed too sensitive, before it went off the rails.
It seems likely that there was good-faith negotiation between the researchers and some reasonable people at FireEye. Then some dumbass executive (general counsel, perhaps?) got wind of the proceedings and decided to blow shit up.
That's not surprising. Being nice can come back to bite you if the other party turns out to be not nice.
Alice says "hey, we'd like if you toned it down a bit, but otherwise appreciate your research. Good luck with your presentation." Bob then releases all of Alice's source code in his presentation. Alice sues bob, but oops, she said "good luck." No dice.
Independent of whatever is "right" or "just" or "reasonable", there are more downsides and potential liabilities to saying "yes" than saying "no".
6 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 22.6 ms ] threadAlice says "hey, we'd like if you toned it down a bit, but otherwise appreciate your research. Good luck with your presentation." Bob then releases all of Alice's source code in his presentation. Alice sues bob, but oops, she said "good luck." No dice.
Independent of whatever is "right" or "just" or "reasonable", there are more downsides and potential liabilities to saying "yes" than saying "no".