[–] jcr 10y ago ↗ This submission was reposted by request. The POCA software was mentioned in the "How FDA Reviews Proposed Drug Names" PDF and is somewhat interesting reading:http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/MedicationErro...The PDF was previously submitted by 'aclimatt' here:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10079659
[–] treerex 10y ago ↗ Here are two papers that describe the techniques used by the FDA system (or that were used in the mid-2000's) to find these confusable names."Automatic identification of confusable drug names" (2006, http://goo.gl/W5DK0f PDF)and"Identification of Confusable Drug Names: A New Approach and Evaluation Methodology" (2004, http://goo.gl/RziUgf PDF)Both by Grzegorz Kondrak and Bonnie Dorr.I've used the BI-SIM in a medical-informatics system and it does quite well. I'm also a big fan of EDITEX, which for some uses is better.
2 comments
[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 14.0 ms ] threadhttp://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/MedicationErro...
The PDF was previously submitted by 'aclimatt' here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10079659
"Automatic identification of confusable drug names" (2006, http://goo.gl/W5DK0f PDF)
and
"Identification of Confusable Drug Names: A New Approach and Evaluation Methodology" (2004, http://goo.gl/RziUgf PDF)
Both by Grzegorz Kondrak and Bonnie Dorr.
I've used the BI-SIM in a medical-informatics system and it does quite well. I'm also a big fan of EDITEX, which for some uses is better.