10 comments

[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 31.5 ms ] thread
But it's not NoSQL so it's garbage.
I've used MariaDB in production a few years back and didn't notice any differences in operation except for an esoteric bug with some version of Ubuntu that required making a minor change to the config file...otherwise, it worked as a drop-in replacement as advertised, though this app didn't do anything particularly exotic outside of the standard Rails/ActiveRecord conventions...

Has much changed? Is MariaDB still pretty much a drop-in replacement? And has anyone moved a non-trivial app from MySQL to MariaDB...or would be confident in making that move on RDS, on the heels of this announcement? I mean, if there aren't any production problems, the change in licensing [1] alone seems like it could be enough of a reason (although I may be misunderstanding MySQL's licensing, it's always been a little confusing to me).

[1] http://stackoverflow.com/a/227242

We moved from MySQL on RDS to MariaDB and back and didn't run into any real issues.
Just to clarify here:

The license for MySQL remains the same (GPLv2). It has not changed at any point.

(comment deleted)
Apparently this doesn't include the version that comes with data at rest encryption (10.1.3):

https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/data-at-rest-encryption/

MariaDB 10.1 is not a GA release, yet. When it goes GA, presumably this will also be available on RDS. Currently 5.5 & 10.0 are GA releases.
Currently 6 out of 30 links on HN are Amazon links, 4 of them in the top 5. Looks like someone paid for placement.