19 comments

[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 55.1 ms ] thread
I wish I had known. I just threw away an AOL 3.5 inch floppy disk. Before there were aol cds, they used floppies.

Odd what people collect.

I have a few AOL disks that I refuse to get rid of. I don't even have a disk drive anymore. It's part of my childhood. My wife thinks I'm crazy... but I like them.
There's some 9 or 10 shoeboxes full of 3.5" floppy disks in my parent's basement. Probably 3 of those are just AOL disks.
Now I'm wondering if I could still find the set of 5.25" disks for Prodigy circa 1990 in my parents' house. I'd say 50% chance they're still there. Something to look for next time I'm visiting. :)
Kinda makes me wish I had kept my parents' old 5.25" Quantum Link disk for the Commodore 64.

That's what AOL was originally called, and it was so fascinating for a kid who had never even heard of "online" back around '89 or so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Link

I still have an Apple ][ AOL 5.25" disk I kept in my old PC dual drive as a dust barrier.
My family mostly started gluing felt to the back of them and using them as coasters.
The accounting fraud's[1] the best part of the AOL CD lore.

  For fiscal years 1995 and 1996, AOL capitalized most of the costs
  of acquiring new subscribers as "deferred membership acquisition 
  costs" ("DMAC") -- including the costs associated with sending disks
  to potential customers and the fees paid to computer equipment 
  manufacturers who bundled AOL software onto their equipment -- and
  reported those costs as an asset on its balance sheet, instead of 
  expensing those costs as incurred. 
The financial impact?

  Had these costs been properly expensed as incurred, AOL's 1995 reported
  pretax loss would have been increased from $21 million to $98 million 
  (including the write-off of DMAC that existed as of the end of fiscal 
  year 1994), and AOL's 1996 reported pretax income of $62 million 
  would have been decreased to a pretax loss of $175 million.
[1]https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-42781.htm
cool, interesting. can you comment on why they did that?
Not the parent, but I think the reason is simply making your numbers look better. If you report the numbers this way, you look like you lost less money by writing off the disks as an asset instead of a marketing spend.
Does anyone know if all the releases of AOL software are archived or there is something like bitsavers for these software releases? I wonder out of 4000 unique disks how many unique software releases there were. 10-20 or 1000s?
And I thought I was special with my AOL 1.1 floppy disk.
Warning, this story is a tad graphic.

I had a friend, a very big guy, who kept a few hundred AOL CDs in the trunk of his car. He would put one in his pocket when he went to friend's houses. When he used the bathroom, his poop was often too big to go down the toilet so he would use the CDs to cut up the poop first.

True story.