This story is extremely relevant to the general discourse here, and I am interested in peoples opinions. No dog in the fight, but I know people on both sides.
I don't have a problem with your trying to draw attention to this story, but the lack of any substantive reporting on the case is puzzling and makes discussion difficult.
This article doesn't have a whole lot of info on what is really going on.
But why is it news worthy that a US court would NOT allow testimony that a UK and Europe court found it lawful? So these other courts found that it was lawful in the US?
7 comments
[ 5.0 ms ] story [ 26.0 ms ] threadThis story is extremely relevant to the general discourse here, and I am interested in peoples opinions. No dog in the fight, but I know people on both sides.