Ask HN: Why did this video do so poorly?
A friend of mine is working on a video content startup called PLGRM (plgrm.com.au). They are struggling to get a consistent amount of views and can't figure out why.
I am trying to encourage the founder to seek more feedback from viewers so I thought I'd post this to get some honest opinions and possibly shake up his perspective.
Here is their latest docco that has had less than 1,000 views in 5 days. Why did this video do so poorly?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6qsYAYUyns
15 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 41.6 ms ] threadhttps://twitter.com/PLGRMage https://www.facebook.com/plgrmage?fref=ts
Trying to get the founder on here to answer about the audience.
Do you feel like a call to action is a must if the topic is of a socially conscious nature?
The title isn't great (sounds like an ad and the actual title might get cut off in compact views) and the thumbnails all only show the logo. The name and logo probably are not well known, so they don't give any motivation to click it, even if I would see them somewhere.
Do you think it might be obnoxious having 'PLGRM presents' in the title to attract a wider audience who has no connection, or hometown interest in the small network?
If the name means something, I'm hopefully already following you on Twitter/YouTube/... and get info that way, or recognize the channel name. Or if you want to keep it in the titles, put it at the end. ("$Title, by PLGRM" or something)
Also Twitter: The last few tweets ("I just added $video to $group on vimeo") are IMHO useless or even annoying, but what I see before looks good: eye-catching picture, good teaser-text, ...
who are the targeted users? why would people be attracted to the videos?
What is it that specifically does not interest you? Is it the genre or style in the way the stories are told?
And the process of finding connections is really cheap, all I need to do is peeking at the hottest art submissions and clicking into the artist's page. Only few seconds to build up a new connection vs watching 5 min video of a stranger that I'm not interested.
the skate girl video, for example, doesn't interest me. If I were really interested in this topic, a simple youtube search gave way more content to follow: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=skateboard+awes...
honestly, I also easily get aesthetic fatigue with the style too. the videos are of good quality for sure, but after watching few of them, I can't remember who they are anymore.
Do you prefer photos over video content? Ie. A photo series of 10 powerful images that convey an easy message as opposed to a 5 minute video?
In relation to aesthetic - are you in need of different styles per different topic to break down this aesthetic fatigue?