[–] zurn 10y ago ↗ Perf numbers copypaste from README (misformatted on github on my browser due to linewrap): Device under test Network interface Kernel forwarding Fastforward enabled netmap-fwd C2358 (2 core, 1.7 GHz, 4 GB RAM) Intel I354 123 kpps 217 kpps 945 kpps C2758 (8 core, 2.4 GHz, 8 GB RAM) Chelsio T520 10G 270 kpps 426 kpps 1.683 Mpps Xeon-D 1540 (8 core, 2 GHz, 32 GB RAM) Intel X552 10G 439 kpps 557 kpps 2.230 Mpps Xeon E3-1275 (4 core, 3.5 GHz, 32 GB RAM) Intel X520-2 10G 1.058 Mpps 1.331 Mpps 5.053 Mpp [–] voltagex_ 10y ago ↗ Whoa, that's gonna be useful for FreeNAS.
[–] A010 10y ago ↗ Does pfSense gain performance with this? [–] pyvpx 10y ago ↗ considering it was done by the "owners" of pfSense, I'd say yes. [–] gonzo 10y ago ↗ not yet.This is about routing, and pfSense is more of a NAT/packet filter platform. [–] stock_toaster 10y ago ↗ Might be useful for the BSD router project[1].[1]: http://bsdrp.net [–] gonzo 10y ago ↗ Olivier is quite excited.
[–] gonzo 10y ago ↗ not yet.This is about routing, and pfSense is more of a NAT/packet filter platform.
[–] stock_toaster 10y ago ↗ Might be useful for the BSD router project[1].[1]: http://bsdrp.net [–] gonzo 10y ago ↗ Olivier is quite excited.
[–] josteink 10y ago ↗ IPv4 only though. [–] gonzo 10y ago ↗ Noted, but it's not difficult to add IPv6
11 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 32.5 ms ] threadThis is about routing, and pfSense is more of a NAT/packet filter platform.
[1]: http://bsdrp.net