Ask HN: Do we need Engineering Managers?
People(engineers) don't leave jobs anymore; they leave managers. I've seen so many bad managers in my career that I strongly believe we should get rid of that extra layer. Here's the reasons why:
1- Managers are expensive.
2- Manager = Dispatcher. They dispatch tasks coming from above and make sure work is done.
3- They push engineers, they don't pull them (leader vs boss).
4- They don't treat people equally.
5- Micro management, micro managerment, micro management...
6- We have to deal with their personalities.
7- We have to justify everything we do etc.
What are your thoughts? I believe companies should minimize layers of management and invest in a more self-managed company culture.
9 comments
[ 0.28 ms ] story [ 31.2 ms ] threadIt sounds like you're currently working for some managers that should be left. They aren't all like that.
These 2 things can easily be handled by the engineers (e.g. agile methodologies, etc). You always need a boss to make a big decision like getting rid of someone for example or picking up the next big thing. %99 of the decisions made at the 1st level, maybe even the 2nd level of managements are usually not relevant. Again, they only dispatch the work and approve your vacation requests. You have to go higher to start seeing people making real decisions for a company.
Managers also:
1. Handle administrative concerns like requests for leave, vacations, illnesses, deaths in the family, etc.
2. Understand each of their reports' career goals and try to put them on projects where they can grow & contribute best.
3. Handle personality conflicts between individuals on the team.
4. Make sure that individual contributors get recognition for their work.
5. Encourage their team to keep going in the face of obstacles.
6. Protect their team from interruptions by handling many of the external inquiries themselves.
7. Connect team members with relevant collaborators in other parts of the organization.
Now, there are good managers and bad managers, and typically good managers will do more of the activities on my list while bad managers will do more of the activities on your list. But that isn't a reason to get rid of managers entirely. Rather, it's a reason to invest in manager training, make sure they understand their role, and ensure that you've hired good managers and fire the bad ones.
Good engineering management insulates you from the corporate politics and irrelevant stuff going on above you. You really want that insulation, because those who don't do corporate politics can still have politics done to them.
Wow, are you an optimist. Sure, it could be, but it probably won't be.
You seem to think that engineers are wonderful human beings and managers are horrible. It's not that simple. If you're finding 10% good managers and 90% bad ones, you'd likely find 10% engineers good at interacting with others while self-managing, and 90% who will get into petty vindictive garbage and make your office a miserable place.
What if you promote a "bad" engineer? She/he would have a much bigger impact on people = more impact on the company. The problem is not about engineers vs managers. The problem is about micro bubbles within a company which create micro cultures that are often driven by these (micro) managers. A solution would be to put everyone at the same level. That sounds very naive and provocative... but after all, there hasn't been much innovation in that space within the last 20-30 years. We manage engineers like we used to manage workers in a factory. I think the model does not apply anymore. That's just my naive/ideal world opinion...