2 comments

[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 9.4 ms ] thread
This is a horribly written piece and littered with inaccuracies. Please don't take it seriously. It repeatedly references "reunification" as well as very old political positions the KMT held in the years after they invaded Taiwan. They were never elected by the people and the island was under martial law until about 30 years ago.

The article also repeatedly mentions "reunification". But Taiwan hasn't ever been part of the PRC (China's current government). Before the KMT invasion, Taiwan was a flourishing colony of Japan with educational and transportation infrastructure far surpassing that of China.

One would have to go all the way back to the Qing dynasty to find a time when Taiwan was part of a the same country as most of the land currently known as China. One might as well talk about Denmark "reunifying" with Germany because of Prussia.

The real issue is China is powerful, has the ability to veto any UN resolution regarding Taiwan and the economic clout that even many EU countries are selling them weapons (or in the case of France, even doing joint invasion drills right before the Taiwanese election that cemented the Democratic Progressive Party's future). http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3512088.stm

This isn't about ethics. It's about power. Never in my life have I seen a clearer case of might vs right.