Ask HN: How do develop a side project when you have a 40hr/week job?

153 points by ciaoben ↗ HN
I am a developer and I have a 40 hr/week job. It is a very good job and I put a lot of effort in it. But I have also my own ideas that I would love to develop, but I am struggling to organize time and material to develop something for me.

I read a lot and have a lot of ideas, about little porjects to test new technologies or new patterns, but never find the time.

I would love to learn the experience and techniques used by someone who have been able do to something like this

130 comments

[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 202 ms ] thread
The theory is simple, practise is difficult. Aim for the absolute most bare bones side project you can, and throw a few weekends (or other time to spare) at it, and get it going. From there, improve when you can. Given time, your dream project emerges.
One way (though perhaps not the best and certainly not the only) to look at it is that the forty hour job is a filter. Ideas that don't get worked on are things that deep down don't seem worth working on after hours (never mind quitting the forty hour gig for).

Derek Sivers says a bit about the general problem in this recent interview: http://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2015/10/14/creativity-an...

Definitely agree. Who says you have to find time for the side project? I believe if it's an idea you're truly interested in, you'll find time somehow. In the meantime, go spend that time with friends/family, a hobby, or a new TV show (I recommend Fargo)
There are a few ways . . . typically I'm so excited about a side project I'll skip watching TV and spend an hour or two on it at the end of the night.

Time outside the typical 40 hour work week:

Getting up an hour or two earlier than usual.

Spending an hour or two at the end of the night on it.

Same on the weekends, early or late, maybe schedule a 4 hour time on Sat or Sunday afternoon.

Those are really the only three areas to find more time with a 40 hour gig.

Obviously make your main job your priority. Be careful of any IP clauses in your contract if this is building something you want to profit from.

One other possibility, depending on where you work. You could probably use your lunch hour to learn new things, do tutorials. You should probably bring in your own laptop and use your phone's hotspot for this to keep things completely off work hardware/bandwidth.

If it's something you enjoy doing it won't feel like work or like you're missing something.

Make sure you balance this with spending time with family and friends.

I was working full time as an engineer in another field, started doing websites for family and friends, then moved on to developing web applications for clients along with my own side projects during the time slots listed above. It can get tiring along with a 40 hour job. Now I'm consulting full time remote so I work on client work 40 hours a week and use any extra time for my own side projects.

The holidays is a good time to kick off a side project as you'll typically be taking vacation days so you'll have some extra time that you would normally spend commuting, eating lunch, working that you can use for a side project.

Good luck hacking away on your side projects.

Use your paycheck to directly pay a braindead coder with zero creativity or ambition who does nothing more than meet requirements, like you're fucking dictating to them. for added oomph they can be in a low-income country, but people with no creativity or initiative or ability to translate requirements into code aren't worth much anywhere.

So rather than code anything yourself, just give htem requirements that read like a to-do list for yourself, after you've already doen all the theoretical leg-work:

#1.1 to-do: when this form is submitted, pop up this confirmation form:

#1.1.1 Confirmation asking if user wants to leave page? #1.1.1.1 if user clicks yes, redirect them to the link clicked #1.1.1.2 if user clicks no, keep them on page.

#1.1.2 Form submission: when user submits form, run valdation

#1.1.2.1 if the name is not betwene 2 and 30 characters show an error "Name must be between 2 and 30 characters"

#1.1.2.2 if the email address is not in the format (one or more characters or numbers) @-sign (one or more characters or numbers) and contain at least one period after hte @-sign, then error message reads "Please input a valid email address."

and so on and so forth. stuff that makes your eye water regarding how incredibly, uselessly boring it is, like you're an executive and can't even tell your business manager to accept a bid, you must fucking dictate the letter itself.

However, as incredibly annoying as this process is, it takes you approximately half an hour to do a day's worth of work with it. You can review progress every day in half an hour over breakfast.

So, there is your answer regarding how to build a side project while you're working full-time: manage dirt-cheap disposible developers on Odesk or Elance who get off on adding absolutely zero benefit whatsoever of any kind to a project, besides doing exactly what they are told in painstaking detail.

This is being made from a throwaway because I haven't heard this idea expressed and people might not realize that this is the answer. As for my tone/style, I think it's completely wrong for any developer to agree to be in such a role, and the REAL correct solution would be to manage a creative, contributing developer who gets equity in the result and has more free time than you. But what do I know.

Serious question: has any product or service of lasting value and success ever come out of an approach like this? It runs counter to most commonly-held beliefs on how great ideas turn into great products.
absolutely, but nobody talks about this. This is simply handing off requirements, contracting them out. Your question can be rephrased as "has any product or service of lasting value and success ever had any part of it contracted out" and clearly the answer is yes. Not everything is built in-house. People don't usually mention it however.

(it's not accepting my edits on the original comment, I am trying to change "aren't worth much anywhere" (which sounds like a value judgment) to "don't command a high rate anywhere.")

I can confirm, though I cannot legally name the products.

As a hint, it's pretty probable (if you live in US) that your healthcare financial information is managed by a system that I took part in development while being 2-grade student freelancing at the other side of the Earth. And many my friends did the same.

I've seen the biggest internet websites have their major customer-facing features developed by my friends, yet everybody thinks it was done in California.

Ya, but you could do that little bit of stuff in less time then it took to write up the spec, put up the work, sift through potential contractors and ensure what you got met your needs (going back to step 2 when it didn't). Plus you would know how it fit together since you wrote it so it would be somewhat easy to alter/reuse.

As far as side projects, 40 hours a week to work isn't that much. I usually work 50+ and have most of my work life. Lots of people work even more. If you did this you would have at least ten hours a week to work on a side project. Incidentally, I still have spare time. To do things like post this comment. What are you doing with your spare time? Video games? Movies? Facebook? Might be worth looking at. Life is short and you don't get time back.

Start small. Do a little project. Something that takes 8 or 10 hours. Then, with that under your belt tackle something bigger.

Coding the idea is probably the easiest part. Getting people to use your product and iterating over user feedback is time consuming. Also, "build it and they will come" doesnt work (more so in the AppStore)
Agreed. But the topic was building a side project not getting users... which is certainly the more difficult part.
I've found having a third space is useful. You have your home and your office, find a third that you can fit easily into your daily routine, and spend 1-2 hours there when you can. My train home goes past a library that's open late, so a couple of times a week I'll go there after work with a laptop.
I'll second this. Find a place that is close or convenient. Of course if you're the kind of person that is waiting for the next distraction to avoid stuff, then no solution will work. If you're motivated by what you're doing there's nothing that can stop you from having fun building it.
I've felt this need for a third place very strongly lately. My office is in my house, and I work from home, but I'm such a homebody that I'm thinking about converting my garage into an electronics workshop and darkroom.
Seconded. I'm using a coworking space (there are some in every country), the one I'm in has an "after office" special plan :) and is pretty cool:

http://coworklatam.com/montevideo-uruguay/

The bonus is you get to meet other smart and motivated people too.

I'm trying to build my side project after a 48 hour workweek, and to be honest it's a bit of a struggle.

My plan is to do customer validation first, and if it works, get a small amount of seed investment and go for it.

I've found that an emphasis on a clear spec, decoupling, testing, and producing quality code significantly reduce the "spin up" time that gets ever more daunting in an infrequently-visited project.

A clear spec means that I know what all has to be programmed. Decoupling my components means that I can make changes to my business-logic/back-end without having to make changes to my display/front-end, as long as the interface remains the same. Testing means that I can make changes without fear that I'm going to unknowingly break existing features. Quality code means that I can more easily understand the code that I've written after an absence. The upshot is that I always feel comfortable making a few quick changes, pushing commits, even after being away from the code for a few days.

A few concrete tools for writing quality code: write it to be open sourced, write it to be viewed and collaborated upon; use code quality tests like pylint, jshint, code-climate, whatever is appropriate for your language; display your code quality metric badges in your repo, badges for coverage, built-status, etc.

Same as for working out or cooking, you can always find time.

I cut alcohol years ago and tend to go to bed at reasonable hours: the feeling of waking up at 5:30, getting a good workout and two to three hours of work before you even start to get ready for the office is pretty empowering. It feels like you already had a day worth of productivity in.

So, to recap:

1. Don't drink (or drink in moderation). It leads to late nights, difficult mornings and wasted hours on (often) empty discussions/interactions.

2. Go to bed early. Avoid screens in the bedroom (they keep you awake) and work out in the morning (helps to feel tired at the end of the day).

3. Wake up early.

Where there's a will, there is a way.

Regarding your second (sub) point about screens, I've found that f.lux and redshift (on linux) have been a huge help for me being able to get to sleep quickly after an evening of side-projects and homework.
I've used f.lux for a while but I tend to simply not have my laptop in my bedroom anymore. I get bored more quickly to read stuff on my phone or tablet, and tend to simply go to sleep instead (as opposed to a laptop where I multi-task, chat with folks and open a gazillion browser tabs).
Yes, I agree, I think that color temp tools are best used to even further remove the sleep effects of screens. Most of my usage is on a desktop in my living room office area, and my laptop never goes to the bedroom. I would advocate for using those tools on top of banishing screens from bed.
Just curious, what time do you go to sleep to get up at 5:30? Do you get around 8 hours? I'm guessing at least a little bit less.
The secret to getting up early and it not feeling like torture is going to bed early. I'm getting sleepy around 9pm, and am in bed between 9 and 9.30pm. Depending on my need for sleep I naturally wake up between 5 and 5.30am. Melatonin has initially helped me get to bed early, now it happens naturally.
Well, kinda depends. Right now, because of some crazy traveling between DC and China, I've managed to mess up my sleeping schedule a bit.

Usually, 10:30 or 11:00 (PM), especially in the summer. I also found out that I sleep in two chunks when I'm on a proper schedule. I first thought I had a problem until I read about segmented sleep [1].

It seems that there is evidence that before the industrial revolution (and ubiquitous artificial lighting), people would simply wake up in the middle of the night, read, eat or be intimate for 30 minutes and then go back to sleep.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segmented_sleep

I am on a similar schedule, and I will start getting tired around 8:45 or so. I'm usually in bed by 9. My first alarm is 4:27 but if I'm particularly tired or don't have anything extra to get done in the morning I will turn that one off and let the one at 4:55 wake me up.
"Getting up early" advice definitely doesn't work for all people. I, for example, am more productive at evenings/nights and my brain doesn't work at until 9-10am despite of how much did I sleep a night before. The better advice would be "adjust the routine to your natural rhythm".
I thought the same until I started a job that required an early start. Even after years of extreme night-owl scheduling I didn't find it difficult after a the first month or so.
Well, my work starts at 8am for more than 5 years now, still can't get used to that.
I thought I was a night owl as well for years. I even had insomnia through college.

But we're all wired to sleep at night. Once I started going to bed early, waking up early got easier first, and enjoyable later.

So no, I think I would still recommend people to try and sleep early to wake up early.

Has there been any scientific evidence suggesting this is the case?

In college I struggled to wake up in time for 8am classes (that I had no interest in taking). Not surprisingly, a big part of the problem is that I was staying up until 11, or 2, or 4 every night. My typical schedule now (29 years old) is asleep around 9, up at 4:30 and gym 5-6:30 or so. Weekends are only an hour or so later than that, and it's been that way since about 3 years ago.

My point is I think it is as much why you're waking up early as it is a "natural rhythm" or something like that. I would much rather go to the gym at 5:30 than to a liberal arts gen ed class at 8:00. Yes it's possible my circadian clock shifted I suppose, but I think it's as much desire or habit as anything else.

I can get up early and do things, but I feel best when going to bed at 2-3am and getting up at 10-11am. By "natural" cycle I meant that if woken up without an alarm clock and go to bed when feeling sleepy (i.e. during lazy holidays) I tent to align to the mentioned hours.

Has there been any scientific evidence suggesting this is the case?

Can't find it after quick googling, but I've read about a study which claims that there are no such things as "night owl persons", but it didn't convince me as it was talking about extreme cases as staying up all night long and sleep during the whole day.

But yes, I remember reading in science journals regarding the natural rhythm of averagely around 10-11 o'clock in the morning. As the person mentioned before it was naturally for him to wake up later, or it was harder for him to wake up, until he god used to the unnatural rhythm.

But there was also some evidence regarding the era before modern technology and electricity about the time when people go to sleep naturally. which is actually surprisingly due to instead of spending time on screens they spent it socially or with other activities and still ended up in bed quite a bit later

One great advantage by staying up late rather than waking early is the amount of people active. More people are outside, or want to communicate with you, traffic is louder and so on. In the night after 12-01 those things calm down
Unless you're young and everyone is on the same schedule - I still get a lot of friends poking me at like 11:30 before I go to bed.
> Has there been any scientific evidence suggesting this is the case?

Yes. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/1185131...

Before the age of 55, the circadian rhythms of adults are completely out of sync with normal 9-to-5 working hours, which poses a "serious threat" to performance, mood and mental health.

Dr Paul Kelley, of Oxford University, said there was a need for a huge societal change to move work and school starting times to fit with the natural body clock of humans.

Experiments studying circadian rhythms have shown that the average 10-year-old will not start focussing properly for academic work before 8.30am. Similarly, a 16-year-old should start at 10am for best results and university students should start at 11am.

    > Don't drink (or drink in moderation)
This was the key ingredient when I had two jobs and was doing an MSc.
(comment deleted)
I don't go out and drink as much as I do, but ironically, spend more time planning how to make cocktails as a hobby.

I consider it an upgrade of quality over quantity ;-)

I agree you should avoid working in the bedroom tho, or you might find it harder to sleep.

Post some contact information and I'll be happy to discuss in more detail. Meanwhile, do you have family or anything else that takes up time outside of your 40 hours? If not, you should easily be able to find 16 hours on the weekends by "working" a 7 day week.
Weekday: Wake 9am, Work & Lunch 10-6, Dinner 7-8, Side Project 8-11, Sleep 12-9, Repeat.

Weekends are for chores and socialising.

There's 168 hours in a week. Get up earlier. Stay up later. Sleep less. Put in time on weekends.
Sleeping less is not really a sustainable or good idea. Nobody's productive or happy if they're sleep deprived.
Another question: How do you develop a side project when your employer insists that it owns all intellectual property you produce?

Edit: As far as I know this is a very standard clause in tech company employment contracts, and is perhaps the legal default even in the absence of such a clause. For example, see "Employed to invent" under http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/pre-invention-assignm... .

California is an exception to the above: here employees may retain the rights to IP they create on their own time, not using resources of their employer (including company laptop), and, importantly, not in the same line of business as their employer. In the tech field, the "same line of business" caveat can be killer.

Start networking and lining up other prospective jobs.

When you have some strong leads, you approach your employer about renegotiating that part of your employment contract. Don't threaten to quit or hold those leads over your employer's head. Express that some of your colleagues with other companies are explicitly allowed to own all of their projects developed during their own time.

If that fails, follow through on those leads. Don't work on any personal projects until you have officially left your current job.

This is a very important question - many employers get mad when you have side projects. Tread carefully or at least work on something clearly unrelated to the business of your employer.
You have 3 options, I'm neither advocating nor dissuading against either.

1. Renogiate with your employer: but beware, many employers with this clause in it are unlikely to remove it, plus even bringing up the possibility will make an independent thought alarm go off in management/your HR file. I myself do not seriously suggest this strategy. It also makes it almost impossible to then implement strategy 3, as record of the request is itself something that may link your future work back to this company.

2. Quit/find another employer.

3. Lie. Work on your own project somehow, and make sure nothing can concretely link it back to your time working with said company. Do this until you can implement strategy 2.

Work for a friend. In my experience, they can pretty much write their own contract in that situation.

If that isn't an option, at least be head-hunted. Then you can negotiate much of the contract.

A (the left-brain/logical approach):

There are 168 hours in a week. If you work 40 of them (+ 10 hours for inconvenient lunch breaks and commuting) and sleep 56 of them, you have 62 hours left. There you go. Figure out where those 62 hours are and spend them wisely. Organize your schedule so you have enough hours when and where you need them.

B (the right-brain/emotional approach):

Yes, you have ~62 hours from the above example, but you probably want a social life, need to eat and exercise, and it would certainly lead to burnout if you spent every free moment cramming side projects where you can. Instead of (or in addition to) managing time, manage your mental energy. Find a pace and rhythm that work for you to make regular progress on projects you deem worthwhile.

It's very important that you know yourself for this to work. Here's what has worked for me:

* Go to the gym on lunch breaks during the week. I reclaim that pesky break in the day, stay healthy, and generally feel refreshed and energized after a visit.

* It's cliched, but I don't have a cable subscription. (I spend my time on HN instead, so I suppose it's a wash)

* Absolutely make time for guilt-free relaxing. For me relaxing is going on a hike or camping trip, grabbing dinner with friends, or playing an instrument.

* Spend time reading. There is a lot of good material on time management or lifestyle design. What's important is that you read and learn to isolate the signal of what matters to you from the noise (and there is a lot of noise).

* Live by this mantra, "If it matters to you, then you'll find a way. If it doesn't you'll find an excuse."

>Absolutely make time for guilt-free relaxing.

This. If you engage in a guilt-laden form, it's not really relaxation, and thus has little utility—rendering it a waste of time.

What might constitute a guilt-laden form?
To me, this means asking the following: when you do something, do you feel guilty after? Do you hate yourself for playing 5 hours of video games every night when you know you could be productive? That's a guilt-laden activity.
For some, the video games might not even be games they particularly enjoy—just grindy/addictive games that have a superior numbing effect or sense of progress.
I've never been the most productive person, but I find myself hitting a wall once I use about 15-20 of those 62 hours on a side project. For my schedule and life, that's the point where it starts impacting things like sleeping a full 8-9 hours and eating healthy meals at regular times.

YMMV and I've known people who regularly put in 35-40 hours of side project work on top of a 40+ hour job, but they've certainly been few and far between in my experience.

I find my lunch hour to short to both eat and then go to gym, and shower. Hell, I usually take at least 15m to shower. PLus I need time between workouts and showering, or else I'll still be sweating after I showered (take about 20m to stop :-/) as such I always schedule stuff like that after work, or weekends.

The TV thing is a must tho. I don't have a TV at all, the gogglebox is licensed to sit down and watch. You even end up watching re-runs, ads etc. so it's less efficient than YouTube, even factoring in all the shit on YouTube..

If you don't relax enough though, you just end up crashing, in an unscheduled manner... I'll not though, I don't consider reading that relaxing - It still requires a lot of thinking, for technical reads anyway, plus the actual process of words-to-brain-concepts translation is surprisingly exhausting as well...

On the last bullet, My brains seems to care more about unimportant distractions than important things. I Do have to watch my time...

LOVE the mantra. It rings so true.
The real question is what you are doing the rest of the time you are not at work. If you have a family, that might take up another 32 hours a week. If you sleep 8 hours, there goes another 56 hours. Hmmm, you still have 40 hours left...
I'm going to assume you don't have a whole bunch of children, an underwater mortgage, or massive amounts of debt to service — or some other very compelling reason the following advice isn't going to be practical for you. But if you can swing it, it's vastly more fun and productive than some of the other suggestions:

Start freelancing, quit your job, and move to a cheaper country where you can survive on something like 22 hours of billable work a month (+ business development). Then spend the rest of your time working on your stuff, or whatever you want to do! No sleep deprivation is required, you can still have a life, and you don't need to rigidly structure your time. It's a decent way to keep stress levels down too which yields more productivity!

It does help if you have some savings as a buffer too!

This concept of moving to a different country and living on less hours of work sounds too good to be true. I've heard it proposed before, but I've never known of anyone who has pulled it off. Are there any good examples to read about?

I've met really smart English-speaking developers from other countries (namely Brazil), and I didn't get the impression that they can laze around and work 22 hour weeks to put food on the table and live comfortably.

Perhaps it can work as a temporary thing, like moving around for a year or two, while retaining a home base in your developed country of origin...

My suggestion is a form of arbitrage and it's really quite doable.

If you live in a cheap country and earn money in a more affluent one, you don't need to work as many hours. If you choose to earn money in the local market, you'll end up replacing one 40 hour work week for another. Your Brazilian buddies likely work locally which is why they have similar time constraints as someone living and working in NYC would do.

You also don't keep a homebase in your country of origin because that increases your expenses! It really requires getting over the mentality that the country you were born in has to be your home; it doesn't.

I live in the center of Prague right now. I used to live in London. My expenses all tolled come to around 22,000Kč/month, although I could do it on less. That's roughly £600/US$850/€800. The number of billable hours required to maintain this lifestyle isn't much. I'm also vastly happier here than I was in London.

My suggestion is a method of abandoning a full time job if that full time job is getting in the way of more important goals and aspirations. Something has to give, of course, and cutting expenses in a way that isn't detrimental to happiness is one way to do it.

I acknowledge this advice isn't for everyone. It's like going to the gym: some people don't want to do it, some people can't do it, and some people won't do it despite good intentions. Also, not everybody can do it at the same time!

Were you born in UK? How's social life in Prague for a foreigner like you? Is language a huge barrier?
Indeed I was born in the UK, so in my case living in the Czech Republic indefinitely doesn't come with any visa hurdles and such.

The fact I don't speak Czech is a very rarely a barrier. Sometimes if I'm in the grocery store and I'm not entirely sure what I'm buying I have to use Google Translate. I struggled once in the post office when trying to mail something internationally. I probably should learn conversational Czech, but I'm more interested in learning Spanish.

The nightlife in Prague is awesome and my social life is ideal.

How do you maintain your business development back home? Is it all word of mouth?
I've done something like this. After quitting office work I followed up with working remotely. I'm not sure if I could pull this without spending some time (1+ year) in office where I was able to build connections that allowed me to find remote projects without too much hassle.

As another comment was suggesting, key is to find work for client who is based in "rich" country (for me right now that's US, some of the Europe) and is ok with you working remotely.

If I wanted to work in current location, I'd have to take significant salary cut + start pulling those mentioned 40h/week

I did this more or less.

I moved to Cambodia 3 years ago, spending ~500$ per month on average so far. It's not for everyone of course, but I truly don't care about things that most others would consider necessities. All I need is an internet connection and healthy food, both of which are readily available here.

It's easy to find a clean apartment for 100$ per month in Phnom Penh, that is if you wouldn't be too horrified to actually live among the local people, like 95% of the expats here are.

It definitely is difficult. No doubt about it. Here are few things you need to remember (or things that helped me):

1: Break down your ideas into smaller ship-able chunks

2: Once you've something presentable, start getting market feedback to see if it would make sense going all in

3: If you don't see much interest, don't give up hope, sometimes it is better communication sometimes pivoting required. This is where you'd decide where you'd like to go. I found reddit to be tremendously helpful in getting feedback.

4: This probably is special case for me but I was giving up on software and getting little depressed / overwhelmed with my current stage in life. I like to do artsy stuff once in a while and so I started getsatvik.com, no-one has bought anything yet but this helps me learn marketing, copywriting and understanding how to sell. So think what you'd like to do as a hobby maybe combining that with your ideas could keep you going.

5: I find teaching people is also a great motivator. I now run a regular meetup in my city, learn some new concepts every month, teach them to other people. I don't get paid for any of this but helps to keep me sane.

6: Sometimes having virtual buddies also help. I now have a 'friend' on reddit who helps me with quick feedback / writing critique (as English isn't my first language) and I help him with doing some programming / teaching.

7: Nothing new or revolutionary here but sometimes connecting with like-minded individuals and organizing an accountability group also helps. If you'd like to connect, I'm happy to be your virtual-buddy!

I don't think anyone has said this yet: Use your lack of time as a motivator to distill your side project down to the simplest thing that could possibly work (MVP). This is your opportunity to get really good at that. If you can't test out an idea in a weekend, you need more practice at this not more time.
Stop reading, start doing.

Imagine someone asks how do I train to run a marathon?

Start by running 1 minute a day and add a minute every few days, after 2-3 years you'll be running long enough to run a marathon.

There is no substitute for doing, there are no shortcuts, there is no miracle pill (well, ADHD meds may help...)

You must actively decide that your sideprojects are more important than whatever else you are doing, speaking of which now that my two kids are asleep, and my fiance is reading, it's time for me to stop commenting on HN and start working on my side project.

Time is not something that is lost or found, you have a fixed finite amount of it, and it is continually decreasing the only thing you can do is choose what you do with it.

By that logic, The day before the full Marathon you ran a Marothon-1 minute, and the day before a Marathon-2 minutes...

Even if you are capable of keeping that up, it might be better to increase distance, otherwise you might be just slowing down, making no progress...

Weekends have plenty of time.

But any good side hack will just make the time for itself. It's that stuff you can't not do so you stay up slightly late and will be slightly more tired at work but hey, so what, you'll feel so good about it that you can't wait till the work day is over and you can continue again. Then it'll fade away and you'll get more interested in work again until one night you figure out where you left with the side project and hey, there you go again.

Personally, I've never been in such a good job that I would always have interesting things to do. So, I've observed that my home-hacking is strictly proportional to the amount of boring stuff at work. I need my dose of programming and if I can't get it at work, I'll get it at home. This kind of takes care of side projects on its own.

Start small, work up to bigger projects. By small, I mean 300-1kloc. Or whatever you can bang out in a single sitting. It needs to be cool enough that you feel motivated to finish it too.

Accept that you can probably only get ~8-12hrs of good work on side projects done a week (except when you're really inspired, or when you can spend a weekend on it).

Just pick something you really enjoy and it should be feasible.

I started SocketCluster (http://socketcluster.io/) on the side about 2 years ago while working 45+ hours a week for a startup.

I still spend about 10 to 20 hours a week on it. It's been a great learning experience - The kind of experience that's impossible to get from just being a full-time developer.

Projects to test technologies/patterns - try to find ways to incorporate those in your current job so you can do the learning at work.

Other side projects - work together with a friend or perhaps hire someone so you can split the workload for something you want to build?

Organise your free time in a way you have time for extra projects - ie skip TV, cut down on social media etc. But you have to really love the side project to be able to pull it through

The better question might be to ask what are you doing instead and why. It may be that those things are more important to you, or it may be that you are avoiding other issues.

For me, the challenge in understanding my own choices, is understanding the root of those choices. It can help if you have a neutral third party to talk to about why you choose to do X rather than Y, but barring that there are other techniques you can use.

One is to make an appointment to spend 1 hr a week on some project. When I do this I start with a fresh notebook and pick a time either before I go, or after I get home, from the office to spend on this project. Then when the time comes the first hour is dedicated to writing down in the notebook the goal of what I'm trying to do, why I'm trying to do it, and the things that will have to be true before I can achieve that goal. After an hour I close the notebook and go about my life. The only rule is that during that hour I work on the project and nothing else, and if unavoidedly interrupted I make up the time lost that same day.

The things that make that possible are; It is only an hour, same as watching a TV show or reading through the front page, the notebook retains my mental state between sessions so I don't start out wondering what the heck I was doing last week and what needed to be done.

I found that for me what I really hated was spending an hour coming up to speed on a project and then only having a few minutes to work on it. Very unproductive and very demotivating. But with a process to stop and restart a project in hand, it takes away the restart lag and so I can be productive nearly right away (perhaps 10 minutes reviewing my closing notes from the previous session). Also if my check list is good then I have a good idea of how close I am to the goal.

Time is a finite resource, and learning to budget it will serve you well throughout your career.

Are you saying that you work only 1 hour on a project? If so were you able to complete any project? Just wondering how this could be possible?
1 hour a week, 52 hours a year.

The goal though isn't just 52 hours, its a way of testing your desire to work on something against the call of other things.

People, like the author, feel they have no time to do anything else. But they also generally feel that they can spend an hour doing something like watch a TV show or attend some event. So you commit to 1 hour to work on your project a week. And if you are really interested in it and motivated you will find you spend more than that on it. However if you find you can't keep a commitment even to just a single hour, then that is a good indication that it isn't a priority and you should probably accept that and move on.

Here's how I'd do it:

My basic advice would be "set up a sustainable business that doesn't take up all your time and takes care of your basic income requirements, then develop an idea once you're financially independent enough to do so".

Maxing out your time now, while you're working, is the most stressful way to do anything. Developing something based on your own idea is the most risky way of doing anything.

Rather that focusing on your own ideas, focus on other people's problems, then figure out how to get paid to solve them.

Reduce your bottom line agressively to maximise the chances you can sustain yourself without taking up all your time.

Solve problems and get paid to do it, then systemise that and get other people to do the work. Now you have a business that doesn't take up all your time, but which takes care of your basic income requirements.

You can choose to spin a product off based on that, ie. by automating that business and selling it as a product, or you could use a product extension of that business to increase revenue, or you could just work on something completely tangential.

I do a lot of side projects. I feel like I am lazy but my friends always ask how I manage to find time for it. Which feels weird because it doesn't feel like a lot of time.

Basically, I work 1-2 hours in the mornings, not every day but a few times a week, either after I drop my daughter off at school, or before they wake up. Some nights I work after they go to bed (I am working on a side project right now, it's 10:20pm on a Sunday). Sometimes I stay up late if I can deal with being a little tired the next day. I'd say I get on average about 5 hrs a week out of this. Then, sometimes I carve out weekend days where I get 8-10hrs of work. Other days I'll watch the kids and let my wife go out to a movie or out with her friends to make up for it.

Slow and steady progress. Have realistic expectations. Just chip away at it.

I'm a junior college student doing some side projects[0] while taking 21 credits, jogging daily, going to mandatory club events, etc. Those except side projects take more than 40 hrs/week so I guess I have even less time for side projects than you.

I highly recommend you to read this talk script by Chris Wanstrath[1], one of GitHub's founders. Two of his suggestions:

- Turn off (or lower the frequency of) reading news/RSS/Twitter.

- Do a bit contribution to side project every day and get a streak. I feel John Resig's GitHub profile illustrates the point best[2].

I'm following these two suggestions on and off for a while, but I want to really do them for the whole year 2016.

And my suggestion is to go to some hackathons. You'll be amazed at how much you can get done during a weekend without distractions. Plus you meet a lot of awesome people, sharpen your skills and win prizes.

[0]: http://pwu.me/projects/

[1]: https://gist.github.com/defunkt/6443

[2]: https://github.com/jeresig

>>I'm a junior college student doing some side projects[0] while taking 21 credits, jogging daily, going to mandatory club events, etc. Those except side projects take more than 40 hrs/week so I guess I have even less time for side projects than you.<<

You're assuming that the OP doesn't have a family or other responsibilities. I suspect that you'll look back on junior college, even with 21 credits and mandatory club events, as a time of carefree existence and plentiful free time.