I always wondered when I saw 'Tweet This' button on popular blogs for sharing bookmarks and links. However there was no easy way to go back and search/manage the bookmarks tweeted by you. We have developed an application www.birdpie.com which stores all of the URLs (Web Links) you have entered on Twitter as bookmarks, so you can refer to them at a later date. The application takes care of minified urls to avoid duplication and pulls information from the url to auto-tag and assign a proper title. Some features are pending (like search bookmarks with keywords, etc) but they will be pushed soon.
I'd love to have feedback on its features, appearance or improvements.
In general, I really like the look (CSS3 + HTML5 = Awesome!), but maybe you should have linked to the "about" page, which is a wee bit more explanatory than the demo of your links. It takes a minute to figure out that "slices" and "bites" are a play on the "pie" aspect of the name . . . maybe change the logo to birdPIE to make it a little more intuitive, or perhaps include a pie-like spatula or a fork icon beside the links for people to "get" the lingo.
This is singularly the most common issue I face with new sites. If its brand new explain what it does a bit somewhere near the top of the page. (Even a "What is birdpie?" link on the top of the page works for me)
I think this was an accident. The true homepage to this site is: http://www.birdpie.com/ and the submitted link is http://www.birdpie.com/railsbob which points to a user's page. The only way to truly fix this submission would be to edit the URL.
From the landing page I have no idea what the site is about, so I click 'About'... and I still have no idea. From the <title> tag I can see this isn't something for which I am the target audience. Seems odd to not have that somewhere on the page.
I dunno. What do you have against putting a blurb on your home page that tells what the site is for?
[update: Oh, it's not the home page. But still, I can't tell what this is for, and I should be able to, even on a sub-page.
'Slices' - what? I have been thinking about Slicehost lately, and the first link mentions Ruby, which I don't know. So when I land on this link you have me thinking that maybe the site is a way for Ruby users to manage their slices on Slicehost.
The About page should definitely tell what the site is about. And the help pages are not loading for me.
If you want to do a tweeted-link application, you should add a bit more value - maybe have thumbnails of the destination site, or expand bit.ly/etc. URLs (while keeping the bit.ly one too).
If someone uses bit.ly to shorten every URL they tweet, bit.ly stores the URLs for them already, so...]
Design is nice, but the UI/information architecture is confusing - lot of information that I don't understand, and the nomenclature is awkward. I would suggest showing less information, i.e. you don't need to show who submitted the links on every "slice," considering that all the slices on a page are inherently connected to one person. I think you could get rid of the "see original tweet" text as well, and maybe just show the bird somewhere if you really need that feature (although I think it can be removed).
First thoughts: Looks like digg.com, calling votes 'bites' instead of 'diggs'. Oh, and there are 'slices' too...
After reading the help menu, I understand that tweeted bookmarks are the things in the list (aka 'slice'?).
I think the most important feedback I can give is to either include more help on the landing page (what are bites and slices?), or change the terms to be more obvious at first glance.
The golden rule of UI: never sacrifice usability. Those fonts might look interesting and add to the overall aesthetic, but the smaller versions are virtually unreadable on my machine.
26 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 62.9 ms ] threadI'd love to have feedback on its features, appearance or improvements.
Thanks!
This is singularly the most common issue I face with new sites. If its brand new explain what it does a bit somewhere near the top of the page. (Even a "What is birdpie?" link on the top of the page works for me)
Edit to add: Oh -- the submitted link is -not- to the home page, but rather a subpage.
I felt the same. The worst part was that I actually think your product is useful, even though I'm not a twitter user.
Don't hide your best selling point on some other page!
[update: Oh, it's not the home page. But still, I can't tell what this is for, and I should be able to, even on a sub-page.
'Slices' - what? I have been thinking about Slicehost lately, and the first link mentions Ruby, which I don't know. So when I land on this link you have me thinking that maybe the site is a way for Ruby users to manage their slices on Slicehost.
The About page should definitely tell what the site is about. And the help pages are not loading for me.
If you want to do a tweeted-link application, you should add a bit more value - maybe have thumbnails of the destination site, or expand bit.ly/etc. URLs (while keeping the bit.ly one too).
If someone uses bit.ly to shorten every URL they tweet, bit.ly stores the URLs for them already, so...]
Looks like more of an exercise in ui design than actual functionality, which isn't a bad thing.
Some of the information on the Help page should probably be made more prominent.
After reading the help menu, I understand that tweeted bookmarks are the things in the list (aka 'slice'?).
I think the most important feedback I can give is to either include more help on the landing page (what are bites and slices?), or change the terms to be more obvious at first glance.
Categories and tags are redundant. Remove categories. I like the automatic tagging, but I may want to manually edit them sometimes.
Link to Twitter.com's profiles and tweets. Re-tweet buttons would make sense.