This is great. I've attempted to make PDFs of the website I run using OS X's print to PDF function, which always screws up the background color, placement of certain boxes, comments, etc., regardless of the browser. Your service actually created PDFs that look just like the original AND are text searchable.
What are your plans for the service?
EDIT: I just noticed something: Advertisements are not preserved -- there's just a blank spot (with the background color of the page) where the ads should be. It's not a problem for me, but may be for others.
its just the way you are prompting the download. Even IE blocks it. However it still shows the download. Many sites do this same thing just w/e code your using is not the correct way. 1 day you will learn that Opera is better :) Give it time.
I upvoted him for the exact same accusatory wording and perceived tone - this site is literally just opening http://pdfmyurl.com/ in an iframe to generate the pdf.
The HTML markup is atrocious and you just seem to be pawning the work off to another existing web service which does exactly the same thing you do (http://pdfmyurl.com/)?
CutePDF (virtual printer that "prints" to a PDF) is usually one of the first things I install to any computer. In my opinion that is an easier solution then going to a website to print another website.
It's been said already: we've got plenty of these services. What we really need is a site that does this in reverse on the fly/from a URL so we don't have to wait for PDF downloads just to view a schedule of bus routes.
I think the only way this can be useful is if you code a bookmarklet. The only thing I normally print as PDF from the web are receipts and confirmations.
Were it not for the nofollows on the links, I'd guess this was a shill just to get a link on a site that would later be turned into an all-ads site, or a PDF affiliate site. There seem to be quite a few PDF software affiliate programs if you Google "PDF affiliate."
I didn't realize this service is just repackaging an existing service, so perhaps the following feedback should be directed to the people doing the actual service.
--end edit--
Aside from the point that I'm not sure how this constitutes a startup in any way (taken with a grain of salt; "there's no way a search engine could ever be a startup..."), I think this works pretty well. How are you planning to monetize it if you do in fact intend for it to be a startup?
I like that it actually renders the page with proper CSS3. Most services like this do not support CSS3 (things like CSS rounded corners, etc). I see that it also renders the javascript widgets, so that's another +1.
Also, how do you determine what width to make it? My consultancy's site's width is set to look perfect for widths of 1024px or greater. Below that width, it's not perfect, but usable. I see that this service renders slightly below that width.
What's with this insatiable desire to build PDF converters and video converters these days? Isn't the market sufficiently saturated with both?
It may be that both of these are easy to build solutions for, because they're well-defined and not too technically challenging (given the tools available). But that doesn't mean it's a good idea.
33 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 71.5 ms ] threadHowever, you didn't made the PDF engine yourself, and also there's another service alike, so what's the point from your service?
It's a mini-app and not a mini startup!!!
What are your plans for the service?
EDIT: I just noticed something: Advertisements are not preserved -- there's just a blank spot (with the background color of the page) where the ads should be. It's not a problem for me, but may be for others.
1 Major problem.. it does not work in Opera.
otherwise, though, i ran into unreadable font issues myself for http://procrasdonate.com
worked well for my blog http://proudly.procrasdonate.com
Your request was denied because of its content categorization: "Proxy Avoidance"
Am I missing something?
PDFMYURL's UI is a logo, a submission box, a 'bookmarklet', and (optionally) a description of their API.
How is yours better?
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=cast+iron+c...
The letter spacing in one of the lines was about 10-15 pixels between each letter. Also it messed up the header.
I didn't realize this service is just repackaging an existing service, so perhaps the following feedback should be directed to the people doing the actual service.
--end edit--
Aside from the point that I'm not sure how this constitutes a startup in any way (taken with a grain of salt; "there's no way a search engine could ever be a startup..."), I think this works pretty well. How are you planning to monetize it if you do in fact intend for it to be a startup?
I like that it actually renders the page with proper CSS3. Most services like this do not support CSS3 (things like CSS rounded corners, etc). I see that it also renders the javascript widgets, so that's another +1.
Also, how do you determine what width to make it? My consultancy's site's width is set to look perfect for widths of 1024px or greater. Below that width, it's not perfect, but usable. I see that this service renders slightly below that width.
It may be that both of these are easy to build solutions for, because they're well-defined and not too technically challenging (given the tools available). But that doesn't mean it's a good idea.