I wish I had caught it! I'm on the design side of things and feel a bit slow after missing it.
I considered writing on of which resolution is better for the device, but I figure I'll leave that up to the test of time. I do think 4:3 is a great way to launch it.
I don't get the attraction of the 16:9 thing for TVs, either.
In my family room I've got a limited amount of horizontal space (barring replace a $1500 piece of furniture as well). Switching to HD will really just mean that I have a smaller picture, because with a fixed horizontal measurement I can only make the vertical measurement smaller to fit the aspect ratio.
I don't know if they were being nice or not but I think they pretty much also had to make it 4:3. I have a convertible netbook (Gigabyte T1028X) and its wide screen is ugly in vertical orientation. Books look really weird formatted that way. Web pages too. The only saving grace is that I can dock an OSK at the bottom and the remaining area is more or less 4:3 and I get the keyboard there too, at the same time. That's handy at times. But still looks ugly. So seeing how beautiful is important to Apple and how they want it to be usable in any orientation, I don't think they had a choice.
Not sure what you're saying about Apple's presentation. There seems to be enough horizontal, straight-facing images on their iPad pages. http://www.apple.com/ipad/features/
I've always thought wide screen was strange. Didn't it originally come from projecting from two movie cameras side by side ? It's terrible for closeups in movies. It seems to me the human eye 'viewport' is somewhere around 4:3
I've always assumed that widescreen was adopted because it's a convenient format for theaters: theater rooms are easily far wider than they are high. So it's a convenient way to get a larger image, in a room that is not too excessively high.
13 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 42.8 ms ] threadWhen I saw it, I thought "Oh, they're going back to a 4:3 screen. How nice."
Widescreen displays make it easy for panel manufacturers to skimp on resolution while keeping the same diagonal size.
I considered writing on of which resolution is better for the device, but I figure I'll leave that up to the test of time. I do think 4:3 is a great way to launch it.
In my family room I've got a limited amount of horizontal space (barring replace a $1500 piece of furniture as well). Switching to HD will really just mean that I have a smaller picture, because with a fixed horizontal measurement I can only make the vertical measurement smaller to fit the aspect ratio.
TV was going to put movie theatres out of business. (At least how exec's thought)