Not sure If I understand your question, but my understanding is that we don't yet have the means to store energy in such a dense manner as to able to power a jet engine. Energy density of aircraft fuel is much higher than any battery available.
Not an expert, just the result of a Google search:Fuel has roughly 100x better energy density than lithium-ion batteries(both in weight and in volume), and batteries improve pretty slowly. Before take-off , the weight of fuel is 25-47% of the aircraft's weight.
And since the propulsive efficiency of a jet engine is relatively high(rough search gives 45%-80%) an electric engine doesn't buy much here.
So this isn't really a question of money, but basic limits.
You may also be interested in aluminum-air batteries, which have better than 10 times the specific energy density compared to lithium ion chemistries. The downside is that they aren't rechargable, but that may not matter for flights (they are recyclable though).
Not entirely. Modern jet turbines have ~12:1 bypass ratios, meaning the exhaust is mostly just turning a fan, pushing 11 times the amount of air as goes into combustion.
> "Given that practical lithium-ion batteries were capable of achieving energy-densities of 113Wh/kg in 1994, 202Wh/kg in 2004, and are now capable of approximately 300Wh/kg, it’s reasonable to assume that they will hit 400Wh/kg in the coming decade." -Elon Musk
12 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 33.4 ms ] threadhttps://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/Features/leaptech.htm...
And since the propulsive efficiency of a jet engine is relatively high(rough search gives 45%-80%) an electric engine doesn't buy much here.
So this isn't really a question of money, but basic limits.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium%E2%80%93air_battery
Jet engine thrust comes from the exhaust gas. How do you replace that with electricity? compressing air (pulse jets)? generate plasma?
http://www.aviation.com/general-aviation/elon-musk-toying-de...