The discussion is about why to change to Fisherman from "Oh MY Fish!". There is nothing there to help convince a bash, zsh, or (in my case) tcsh user to "upgrade to fish".
Everything in this github issue comment assumes you know what fish is. For example, the number one point in the summary is that Fisherman is the "fastest ... plugin manager for the fish ecosystem".
A non-fish user will rightly respond with "who cares?"
The other points also assume the reader has in-depth knowledge of fish, which means a bash user will likely find no convincing reason to change much less consider it a upgrade.
1 comment
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 11.9 ms ] threadWhich, by the way, is a command shell, available from http://fishshell.com/ .
Everything in this github issue comment assumes you know what fish is. For example, the number one point in the summary is that Fisherman is the "fastest ... plugin manager for the fish ecosystem".
A non-fish user will rightly respond with "who cares?"
The other points also assume the reader has in-depth knowledge of fish, which means a bash user will likely find no convincing reason to change much less consider it a upgrade.