I was a bit distracted while the interview was playing, but what I gathered is that their efficiency in converting chemical energy (specifically, so far, natural gas and oxygen) to electricity -- perhaps, per a comment I saw elsewhere, when the resulting heat can also be used and so considered part of the equation -- is about twice that of utility generated and delivered electric power.
I don't know whether my understanding is correct, but that's how I currently understand the comments regarding greater efficiency and cost savings.
3 comments
[ 4.5 ms ] story [ 17.7 ms ] threadMight be a naive question, but can anyone please explain to me the economics behind this?
I don't know whether my understanding is correct, but that's how I currently understand the comments regarding greater efficiency and cost savings.