Ask HN: How do you feel about conferences charging speakers for talk?
I recently had a bitter sweet experience where the conference organizers charged a hefty fees for speaking. They were already charging the attendees (quite a lot!). Although my employer was ready to pay for me, I thought it was not fair of them to charge external speakers.
What has your experience been? Do you approve/disapprove?
20 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 52.9 ms ] threadIf you don't know why certain kinds of companies gladly participate in this fairly obvious type of grift, you have no business playing the game.
See also: Paying money to be in some kind of dog-and-pony show or hackathon in the hope that investors attending the event get interested in maybe setting something up to discuss who else is funding you and whether they might want to follow-on.
I think that's a very bad deal.
Traditionally (from my experience), speakers are invited or apply based on a topic and are not asked to pay any fees. The conference costs are covered by the conference attendees, sponsors and booth fees.
I've spoken at many conferences and at all of them I've needed to buy a full-price ticket (or my employer did). RubyConf was one exception I can think of.
I include in this list conferences like NDC Oslo/London/Sydney, Øredev, Nordic Ruby, and Baruco.
I think any conference run by the ACM charges speakers, unless they're keynoting.
I can believe that. As a sidenote: What a weird world we live in, where accredited professionals pay to speak, while dilettantes are paid.
Source: I presented research at a few humanities conferences in my previous career and have presented talks at several PHP conferences in my present career.
I also wouldn't disagree with you or say you are wrong that some conferences are charging speakers entry to the conference, but frankly, I would view them skeptically. To me it is the totally wrong incentive for a speaker to pay to present.
If you think about conferences as a product sold to attendees, it makes sense for speakers not to pay. If you think about conferences as a community platform which everyone pays to run and is to everyone's benefit, which I think is a better way to do things, it does make sense for them to pay.
At some conferences almost everyone is attending is also speaking, so obviously you need to charge speakers in that case.
But to your point, I went to a conference a number of years ago where Microsoft was the host, it was regional and fairly limited attendance from what I remember. There were people from Amazon, Yahoo, Microsoft and other companies there but everyone was very focused and it was a fairly small overall group. I could see everyone paying to attend that one as it was really interactive, very few "speaking" presentations, more workshops. It was awesome honestly, and I'd pay to participate in that type of conference in a heart beat regardless of any role I had.
In most conferences that are not marketing-oriented, the speakers are the product being sold to the attendees. Many conferences pay the speaker's expenses for travel, and may even pay them some speaking fee.
If you are a speaker being offered a fee to speak, however, be very careful about overseas conferences. People have been turned away at the border because the officials may see the money being paid as a job.
I don't like it but could care less what they choose to do. I just don't participate.
To me, a tech industry conference isn't really a scientific symposium. A lot of content is infotaiment.
Good luck.
I expect any conference I speak at to provide at least free entry, if not travel expenses. This expectation appears to be the norm in several industries.