>White-collar types see their peers as life-long adversaries who do not belong in the same boat they are in. Some also believe that they “really” belong to a much more exclusive boat and were just plain unlucky to land in their one they are in.
>Almost every white-collar type sees his peers as his or her biggest enemy. His (or hers) biggest ambition in life is to somehow triumph over them and move to a “better” place.
While I don't doubt this occurs there are plenty white-collar employees that don't look at it this way and don't operate this way. The author has a very cynical view of white-collar employees. Makes me wonder if this is just an attempt to stir up some emotions in the readers of their blog piece.
Since graduating decades ago I have been a white collar employee and employer at times. Today I manage a few people, do work with them (we manage 130+ web sites and code backend and front end) and lead a cross department team. We don't express any of these tendencies. In fact if we did we would not be considered a high performing team and we are considered by others to be just that. We work with people on other teams that seem to be the same as us in terms of desire to get the job done right and in a way that is collaborative and at times fun. Maybe I would believe this more whole-heartedly if the author referred to senior executive white-collar employees. I see and have seen the tendencies the author speaks to more at the Vice President and Senior Vice President level than at the middle manager level.
In a world with scarce resources, everybody competes. It is just who you compete with... Author attempts to say that the union is one group against management, while non-union compete against each other.
Another view is that white collar employees do there best for their employer--thus competing against the employers' competitors. The incentive for doing so is that a rising tide often raises all boats... (See e.g.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/behind-rising-inequality-more-un...) This would lead you tho the conclusion that only an idiot competes within their own company.
Alas, as always, the truth is somewhere between the two extreme viewpoints.
4 comments
[ 4.5 ms ] story [ 18.7 ms ] threadAlso there's a massive difference between a person who "compete"s with their peers and a person who "sees his peers as his or her biggest enemy".
The author makes a good point, and the proceeds to take the argument way too far.
>Almost every white-collar type sees his peers as his or her biggest enemy. His (or hers) biggest ambition in life is to somehow triumph over them and move to a “better” place.
While I don't doubt this occurs there are plenty white-collar employees that don't look at it this way and don't operate this way. The author has a very cynical view of white-collar employees. Makes me wonder if this is just an attempt to stir up some emotions in the readers of their blog piece.
Since graduating decades ago I have been a white collar employee and employer at times. Today I manage a few people, do work with them (we manage 130+ web sites and code backend and front end) and lead a cross department team. We don't express any of these tendencies. In fact if we did we would not be considered a high performing team and we are considered by others to be just that. We work with people on other teams that seem to be the same as us in terms of desire to get the job done right and in a way that is collaborative and at times fun. Maybe I would believe this more whole-heartedly if the author referred to senior executive white-collar employees. I see and have seen the tendencies the author speaks to more at the Vice President and Senior Vice President level than at the middle manager level.
Another view is that white collar employees do there best for their employer--thus competing against the employers' competitors. The incentive for doing so is that a rising tide often raises all boats... (See e.g. http://www.wsj.com/articles/behind-rising-inequality-more-un...) This would lead you tho the conclusion that only an idiot competes within their own company.
Alas, as always, the truth is somewhere between the two extreme viewpoints.