The last sentence of this excerpt is bizarrely added on.
>While some employers worry that older workers aren’t adept in tech tools or platforms, that’s more related to the individual than the age, Griffin says. She recently told a millennial job candidate to update his LinkedIn profile.
I'm not a fan of LinkedIn. People have 'verified' that I have tons of skills that they have no idea whether or not I actually have.
I've also found that plenty of people my age (25) dislike it for various reasons.
Maybe the problem is that the older guys have all been forced into management paths and have been working on nontechnical skills. I really like the valve idea that management is a skill, not a career path.
Why not forget hiring based on age and hire someone who fits well with your team and has either the skills you need or the aptitude and attitude to learn them
"Isn't it all about finding 'A' players who can excel?"
It would be nice if that were true, but there are other factors at play in many jobs. For example, because I'm over 55 and know about the harsh realities of the business world, you'd have a hard time convincing me that I should work 80-hour weeks because your company is going to change the world and I'll get rich on my stock options.
Gross generalisation. But, hey —I'm a lot nearer to 55 than I am to 25. So what the hell!
Older people "learn" stuff.
Younger people "access" information
SOURCE: Nearly two decades in university teaching.
When I started out, you'd explain something and students would make notes. You'd rarely be asked to explain that "thing" again.
Latterly, I found it almost impossible to convince students to take notes and they'd often ask to be shown how to do the same thing on multiple occasions —often on the same day.
My theory is that; with smartphones, Google, Wikipedia, etc. the youth of today are conditioned to being able to access any information, any time, at the tap of a screen. There is no incentive or need to make the effort to retain that information, as it's always there. And they expect their college lecturers to perform a similar 'on-tap' role.
Conversely, for us oldies, we might have learned stuff from a book which we'd borrowed from the library and had to return, or a TV programme which had dissipated into the aether. Sources which were not permanently with us. So we had to make the effort to retain that knowledge, because accessing it again was more hassle than remembering it.
I sometimes think it ironic that the classic SciFi utopian vision of a future where everyone in the human race has access to the combined knowledge of all mankind is almost upon us —and yet seems to have resulted in a population where the average individual knows less and less.
Yes, well... I was in college 40 years, I was back to get a more useful credential 20 years ago, and I saw plenty of students write down stuff that wasn't so, and which they should have known wasn't. My college French teacher ca. 1975 complained that her students seemed to keep their knowledge in walled off compartments, and from what I can see that happens still among many of the cohort.
11 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 35.8 ms ] threadThe last sentence of this excerpt is bizarrely added on.
>While some employers worry that older workers aren’t adept in tech tools or platforms, that’s more related to the individual than the age, Griffin says. She recently told a millennial job candidate to update his LinkedIn profile.
I've also found that plenty of people my age (25) dislike it for various reasons.
Maybe the problem is that the older guys have all been forced into management paths and have been working on nontechnical skills. I really like the valve idea that management is a skill, not a career path.
There are lots of reasons not to bother with linked-in.
Why not forget hiring based on age and hire someone who fits well with your team and has either the skills you need or the aptitude and attitude to learn them
It would be nice if that were true, but there are other factors at play in many jobs. For example, because I'm over 55 and know about the harsh realities of the business world, you'd have a hard time convincing me that I should work 80-hour weeks because your company is going to change the world and I'll get rich on my stock options.
Older people "learn" stuff.
Younger people "access" information
SOURCE: Nearly two decades in university teaching.
When I started out, you'd explain something and students would make notes. You'd rarely be asked to explain that "thing" again.
Latterly, I found it almost impossible to convince students to take notes and they'd often ask to be shown how to do the same thing on multiple occasions —often on the same day.
My theory is that; with smartphones, Google, Wikipedia, etc. the youth of today are conditioned to being able to access any information, any time, at the tap of a screen. There is no incentive or need to make the effort to retain that information, as it's always there. And they expect their college lecturers to perform a similar 'on-tap' role.
Conversely, for us oldies, we might have learned stuff from a book which we'd borrowed from the library and had to return, or a TV programme which had dissipated into the aether. Sources which were not permanently with us. So we had to make the effort to retain that knowledge, because accessing it again was more hassle than remembering it.
I sometimes think it ironic that the classic SciFi utopian vision of a future where everyone in the human race has access to the combined knowledge of all mankind is almost upon us —and yet seems to have resulted in a population where the average individual knows less and less.