Truth be told that was the original response I was going to go with, and it just felt a little off. However, it is indeed quite accurate. 5 year old me would approve.
Interesting enough for you to spend 5 minutes of your life commenting. I agree that it's a bit low on nutrition though. Funny to see stuff like this once in a while, but I wouldn't want the front page to get clogged up with this kind of nonsense.
I'm sorry you received downvotes for asking a question.
Based on the url (test.html), I would imagine this was just someone's quick one-off attempt to see if something worked that ended up getting left behind.
Edit: Looks like this was already answered downthread in the time that I took reading the comments. Whoops.
64 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 61.2 ms ] threadUpdated: to reflect eli's help on origin of command style. Btw, why did someone down-vote me on this?
Now that's semantic html
This one seems offline, but a typical example:
ftp://asapdata.arc.nasa.gov/incoming/BOB/HyspIRI/data-bob/00_README.MASTERweb_updating.txt
http://www.nackerhews.com/item?id=11549946
But that's pretty bad!
[1]: That is before realizing that it's nasa.gov
It did lead to some interesting discussions, so I'm not criticising - just a little disappointed!
Based on the url (test.html), I would imagine this was just someone's quick one-off attempt to see if something worked that ended up getting left behind.
Edit: Looks like this was already answered downthread in the time that I took reading the comments. Whoops.