9 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 33.5 ms ] thread
The larger the ratio of the size of the financial industry to the size of the productive economy at the same standard of living, the less efficient the economy is. Growth in the financial industry is like growth in the amount of oil you have to add to keep your engine from seizing up.
Sounds about right. There's a strong argument that the bigger the size of the financial industry the less innovative and the more extractive an economy becomes.
Just because you don't understand the value someone provides to society doesn't mean they don't provide any. That's why planned economies don't work.
All economies are planned in some way. That's just human history. Once you get to a certain level of large scale organization it's impossible to avoid some level of centralization.
But not to the level where bureaucrats pick wages. That way lies poverty and strife.
Then they shouldn't pick rules on who gets the right to strike either.
Who does that? In the US only government employees and "essential" services don't have the right to strike.

That's the deal when you work for the government, and you know it going in.

It seems to me that the bankers were just as necessary to the Irish as garbage workers were to New Yorkers. Why couldn't the people of New York set up their own program for trash disposal just like the Irish set up their own replacement banking system?
Because it's a job most people don't want to do and that has little reward?