[–] mh- 10y ago ↗ >THIS PROJECT IS AS OF NOV 2014 CLOSED AND WILL NO LONGER BE MAINTAINED!from https://github.com/dotse/PacketQ [–] voltagex_ 10y ago ↗ You'd hope they'd point to an active fork but it's not looking hopeful.https://github.com/dotse/PacketQ/network [–] chrissnell 10y ago ↗ Why does this need to be an active project? If software works as described, what else does one need? [–] voltagex_ 10y ago ↗ There's that aspect too - but there's open issues and 5 pull requests.
[–] voltagex_ 10y ago ↗ You'd hope they'd point to an active fork but it's not looking hopeful.https://github.com/dotse/PacketQ/network [–] chrissnell 10y ago ↗ Why does this need to be an active project? If software works as described, what else does one need? [–] voltagex_ 10y ago ↗ There's that aspect too - but there's open issues and 5 pull requests.
[–] chrissnell 10y ago ↗ Why does this need to be an active project? If software works as described, what else does one need? [–] voltagex_ 10y ago ↗ There's that aspect too - but there's open issues and 5 pull requests.
[–] epicmellon 10y ago ↗ I think cloudshark ended up doing this anyway, probably not with PacketQ on the backend though.
5 comments
[ 1.0 ms ] story [ 172 ms ] threadfrom https://github.com/dotse/PacketQ
https://github.com/dotse/PacketQ/network