23 comments

[ 71.4 ms ] story [ 583 ms ] thread
When it comes to plot colors in matplotlib, it's why I start with

import seaborn as sns

to get a nice plot theme, not "good old 90s" style. See: https://speakerdeck.com/pmigdal/teaching-machine-learning?sl...

I started using viridis a few weeks ago and I love it!
That was an amusing talk. I had fun watching it.
In the talk when he showed the 3 similar maps getting equal score, and then the green one getting a much higher score, that could easily be because people couldn't decide between the 3 similar maps, to they went with the one different map. To do a proper comparison the test should be 1-1 or 3-3, not 3-1.
They wanted green because it's a python library. He goes into the details in the talk
I also enjoy using Olga Botvinnik's prettyplotlib: github.com/olgabot/prettyplotlib
I dislike that the whole page, including the updates, do not contain any dates...
Good point. I'll ping authors to update page with dates.
If you use gnuplot, which I do exclusively, you may like this repository:

    https://github.com/Gnuplotting/gnuplot-palettes
I'm pleased. They look extremely similar to the gnuplot and gnuplot2 color maps already present in matplotlib, my favorites.
OP here: really worth watching the embedded video on this topic. Viridis is born out of an awesome, intense deep-dive into research on human vision and perception.
Is it strange that I find the old "JET" the best? It uses the most hues (green, yellow, red and blue are all there), so things are the most distinguishable. The others are either only blue/green/yellow, or only purple/red/yellow.
Quick, which represents a larger value, green or red?

Having a gradient between two colors, from dark to light, makes it easier to determine the scale. Rainbow gradients look nice, but hue transitions are nowhere near as intuitive as luminance.

I think you're both correct, but your points respond to different needs. For some types of results (and audiences and modes of presentation) its more important that the reader be able to determine the approximate value that a color corresponds to than that the reader be able to quickly intuit the progression of values. For me, Jet is better at the former while Viridis et al are better at the latter.
Yes, that's the point. People like it a lot but are worse at actually interpreting it. It's confusing when people have to read lots of confusing data quickly