11 comments

[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 44.6 ms ] thread
That's it, I quit.
Maybe you could build a book reader that simplifies text or alters the wording of ads based on the eye movements and facial expressions of the user instead :D
No it hasn't. It's a pending patent application in the process of being examined by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
So I guess all babies will infringe on this as they train their neural networks
This appears to be a pending patent, meaning it will not necessarily be granted. It shouldn't be, because the application describes only bog-standard machine learning techniques with no advances on the state of the art as it was when it was filed.
Claim 1 is as broad as a barn. They'll bounce it.

Surely.

Won't they?

I think it will pass, when they read the author names. It's actually a Chinese Neural Network (aka CNN).

> Qi Yin (Beijing), Zhimin Cao (Beijing), Kai Jia (Beijing)

My understanding of patents (having made a few): as long as you have strong lawyers (and good copy writers), you can almost patent anything. I was shocked by what we could get through.
Well, you can possibly patent anything as long as you respect articles of the Patent Law, but if your claims are super narrow, it is worth nothing, as it would be easy to design around and not infringe.