[–] testtesttest 10y ago ↗ If you have a problem viewing the page (due to Dropbox bandwidth limits), here's an archived page (incl. pictures):http://archive.is/1LKwZ
[–] mpnordland 10y ago ↗ So I'm curious, if this can disable Secure Boot, is this a pathway to jail breaking devices that do not allow you to install your own keys? [–] sounds 10y ago ↗ Can you ask a more specific question? The article covers a number of topics and without any additional information, I can only say, "yes, there's a good chance you can disable secure boot -- but no, there's not a high probability of success." [–] mjg59 10y ago ↗ It would be, if there were any Lenovos that didn't allow you to do that. [–] JoshTriplett 10y ago ↗ And if there were, they wouldn't be compliant with Microsoft's requirements either. [–] throwaway2048 10y ago ↗ those requirements were changed, secure boot having an off switch is now optional. [–] JoshTriplett 10y ago ↗ Thanks for the correction. Apparently this changed with Windows 10: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/03/window... [–] mjg59 10y ago ↗ The requirements still state that you must be able to remove all keys, which is equivalent to disabling secure boot [–] [deleted] 10y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] sounds 10y ago ↗ Can you ask a more specific question? The article covers a number of topics and without any additional information, I can only say, "yes, there's a good chance you can disable secure boot -- but no, there's not a high probability of success."
[–] mjg59 10y ago ↗ It would be, if there were any Lenovos that didn't allow you to do that. [–] JoshTriplett 10y ago ↗ And if there were, they wouldn't be compliant with Microsoft's requirements either. [–] throwaway2048 10y ago ↗ those requirements were changed, secure boot having an off switch is now optional. [–] JoshTriplett 10y ago ↗ Thanks for the correction. Apparently this changed with Windows 10: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/03/window... [–] mjg59 10y ago ↗ The requirements still state that you must be able to remove all keys, which is equivalent to disabling secure boot [–] [deleted] 10y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] JoshTriplett 10y ago ↗ And if there were, they wouldn't be compliant with Microsoft's requirements either. [–] throwaway2048 10y ago ↗ those requirements were changed, secure boot having an off switch is now optional. [–] JoshTriplett 10y ago ↗ Thanks for the correction. Apparently this changed with Windows 10: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/03/window... [–] mjg59 10y ago ↗ The requirements still state that you must be able to remove all keys, which is equivalent to disabling secure boot [–] [deleted] 10y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] throwaway2048 10y ago ↗ those requirements were changed, secure boot having an off switch is now optional. [–] JoshTriplett 10y ago ↗ Thanks for the correction. Apparently this changed with Windows 10: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/03/window... [–] mjg59 10y ago ↗ The requirements still state that you must be able to remove all keys, which is equivalent to disabling secure boot
[–] JoshTriplett 10y ago ↗ Thanks for the correction. Apparently this changed with Windows 10: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/03/window...
[–] mjg59 10y ago ↗ The requirements still state that you must be able to remove all keys, which is equivalent to disabling secure boot
9 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 30.4 ms ] threadhttp://archive.is/1LKwZ