Just want to say that this is one of the main reasons why "compromise" is not a viable option between gun control advocates and gun owners.
Gun control advocates want "common sense regulations". As a consequence, they slowly start nibbling away at gun rights.
Gun owners would like to keep their guns.
It makes currently owned goods, which were legally purchased, illegal. Sort of like an eminent domain gone wild.
The legislation like it's written would outlaw you lending a gun to a friend to go duck hunting. It's unclear whether you could let your friend shoot your gun while you're there, but he couldn't borrow it to check it out on a range trip.
> Signed: SB880 by Sen. Isadore Hall III, D-Compton, which expands the definition of “assault weapon” to include specified guns capable of accepting any type of detachable magazine.
> Signed: SB1446, which makes it illegal to possess magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition.
> Signed: AB1135 bans the so-called "bullet button" by defining a "'fixed magazine' to mean an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action."
> Signed: SB1235 requires background checks for people buying ammunition, a license for people selling bullets and purchasing data submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice.
> Signed: AB1695, which makes falsely reporting a gun as stolen a misdemeanor, aimed to discourage straw purchasers of guns, who may claim a gun was stolen if law enforcement have found it to be used in a crime.
> Signed: AB1511, which would remove the exemption for "persons who are personally known to each other" from the lending of firearms without the use of a licensed firearms dealer. Family members would still be exempt for going through a dealer.
This kind of stuff is why no gun owner in their right mind trusts the "common-sense" gun regulation that everybody else seems to believe in and support.
At the very least, it's a huge attack on property rights.
2 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 29.2 ms ] threadGun control advocates want "common sense regulations". As a consequence, they slowly start nibbling away at gun rights.
Gun owners would like to keep their guns.
It makes currently owned goods, which were legally purchased, illegal. Sort of like an eminent domain gone wild.
The legislation like it's written would outlaw you lending a gun to a friend to go duck hunting. It's unclear whether you could let your friend shoot your gun while you're there, but he couldn't borrow it to check it out on a range trip.
> Signed: SB880 by Sen. Isadore Hall III, D-Compton, which expands the definition of “assault weapon” to include specified guns capable of accepting any type of detachable magazine.
> Signed: SB1446, which makes it illegal to possess magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition.
> Signed: AB1135 bans the so-called "bullet button" by defining a "'fixed magazine' to mean an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action."
> Signed: SB1235 requires background checks for people buying ammunition, a license for people selling bullets and purchasing data submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice.
> Signed: AB1695, which makes falsely reporting a gun as stolen a misdemeanor, aimed to discourage straw purchasers of guns, who may claim a gun was stolen if law enforcement have found it to be used in a crime.
> Signed: AB1511, which would remove the exemption for "persons who are personally known to each other" from the lending of firearms without the use of a licensed firearms dealer. Family members would still be exempt for going through a dealer.
This kind of stuff is why no gun owner in their right mind trusts the "common-sense" gun regulation that everybody else seems to believe in and support.
At the very least, it's a huge attack on property rights.