Not shocked that Apple, McDonalds who have both changed global habits on a massive scale have 'trumped' Trump but what is more surprising is that the New York Times Co, with it's global reach, content and presumably lower overhead costs, faired quite poorly compared to Trump.
10 comments
[ 1.8 ms ] story [ 23.8 ms ] threadYou mean, how does it compare to two cherry-picked extremely successful businesses (and one other one thrown in for "objectivity")?
McDonald's doesn't seem like a terrible choice, it's not exactly in an exciting high growth industry.
I guess it would be a good idea to do a couple of baskets though, to compare to market average returns.
Total gain: 1565% Annual gain: 8.62%
So without accounting for dividends (the S&P 500 price doesn't), Trump was about 1% better each year.