Good post. I agree with almost everything he says.
> For example, Scala is great, but I don’t use it much because there’re not enough cases where its features are required
IMO with languages like Scala, JRuby, Clojure etc. that are built on a stable platform, its easy to switch to them. You don't necessarily need to use every feature, even a subset will make you more productive. The use case would be anywhere you use Java.
> I know Python, Ruby, Scala, and Groovy (...) but when I need to actually get things done, I still get them done more efficiently in Java, as long as "more efficiently" doesn’t mean lines of code.
I totally agree with this. Recently I picked up Ruby and really like the language and would love to use it. However, I am very comfortable with Python (and its libs, docs, django etc.) and am not really as productive with Ruby. If I would have picked up Ruby first it would have probably been the other way round.
1 comment
[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 11.7 ms ] thread> For example, Scala is great, but I don’t use it much because there’re not enough cases where its features are required
IMO with languages like Scala, JRuby, Clojure etc. that are built on a stable platform, its easy to switch to them. You don't necessarily need to use every feature, even a subset will make you more productive. The use case would be anywhere you use Java.
> I know Python, Ruby, Scala, and Groovy (...) but when I need to actually get things done, I still get them done more efficiently in Java, as long as "more efficiently" doesn’t mean lines of code.
I totally agree with this. Recently I picked up Ruby and really like the language and would love to use it. However, I am very comfortable with Python (and its libs, docs, django etc.) and am not really as productive with Ruby. If I would have picked up Ruby first it would have probably been the other way round.