This seems pretty ridiculous, for an enterprise network with 20,000+ end users, where is the incentive to pay $140,000 per month with minimal, if any, increased profit margins using windows 10 over windows 7?
Those end users probably average more than $50,000 annual cost, so while $140,000 looks like a nice big number, the context is $80,000,000 per month of other employment costs.
6 comments
[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 35.4 ms ] threadThose end users probably average more than $50,000 annual cost, so while $140,000 looks like a nice big number, the context is $80,000,000 per month of other employment costs.
To me, Windows (and MacOS) are so relatively set that I could go without upgrades for a long time. I don't see how these are services...