Scientists at the School of Oceanographic Studies at the university have noted an alarming increase in the rate at which sea levels have risen over the past decade in the Bay of Bengal.
Until 2000, the sea levels rose about 3 millimeters (0.12 inches) a year, but over the last decade they have been rising about 5 millimeters (0.2 inches) annually, he said.
This is obviously bad reporting. Simple arithmetic:
5 mm x 10 years = 50 mm (2.0 inches)
For 30 years
3mm x 20 years + 5mm x 10 years = 110 mm (approximate 4.5 inches).
There is no way that an island would disappear because of 2.0 inches of water. Low level islands disappear due to erosion very quickly (especially volcanic ones). I actually remember reading in the SA sometime back of a case near NZ or Australia.
Spot on. There has to be other geological reasons for the island subsiding. A ripple has a wave height of 5mm.
I don't know how these stories are getting past editors and into news reporting. It's like their brain switches off whenever they see something remotely linked to 'global warming'.
5 comments
[ 4.0 ms ] story [ 24.5 ms ] threadUntil 2000, the sea levels rose about 3 millimeters (0.12 inches) a year, but over the last decade they have been rising about 5 millimeters (0.2 inches) annually, he said.
This is obviously bad reporting. Simple arithmetic:
For 30 years There is no way that an island would disappear because of 2.0 inches of water. Low level islands disappear due to erosion very quickly (especially volcanic ones). I actually remember reading in the SA sometime back of a case near NZ or Australia.I don't know how these stories are getting past editors and into news reporting. It's like their brain switches off whenever they see something remotely linked to 'global warming'.
I mean, come on, Weather Channel!. If you want people to take AGW seriously, then clean house on your editorial board.
Edit: Looks like this is an AP article, which, of course, explains everything. Sloppy to quote something so obviously wrong.