5 comments

[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 21.9 ms ] thread
This article draws meaningless conclusions. "More innovative"? What does that even mean?

Companies like Facebook and Google select for engineering talent, not people trying to turn a sinking ship around.

Certainly, a percentage (guessing under 10%??) of the employees at Google and Facebook ARE superstars in their fields. But the others are mostly over-rated.
I've read the article twice and I'm still not sure what point it is trying to convey.
Pretty poor assumptions drawn by the survey.
Talk about unclear on the concept. The Good & Co study had nothing to do with quality. It was about thinking attitudes.

You have to be pretty clueless to confuse the two.

Send the writer back to the minor leagues for development.