I had years prior sought to axiomatically describe consciousness.
In reducing the problem, I had encoded a naive, minute ("minoot") function:
c = ⌈P∞⌉ᵘ•σm
…whence “⌈P∞⌉” symbolizes some perceptual vector bundle, that persists on some computational boundary “ᵘ”.
Albeit, the function, though perhaps quite wrong, encompassed some logic; computational systems (life/non life) bound in some computational limit, such that there exists u, a non-polynomial time complete function sequence.
Therein, a quaint meaning rather merely emerged, en passant. See ‘Purgeable Paradox’ section via specified quora url.
1 comment
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 23.0 ms ] threadI had years prior sought to axiomatically describe consciousness.
In reducing the problem, I had encoded a naive, minute ("minoot") function:
c = ⌈P∞⌉ᵘ•σm
…whence “⌈P∞⌉” symbolizes some perceptual vector bundle, that persists on some computational boundary “ᵘ”.
Albeit, the function, though perhaps quite wrong, encompassed some logic; computational systems (life/non life) bound in some computational limit, such that there exists u, a non-polynomial time complete function sequence.
Therein, a quaint meaning rather merely emerged, en passant. See ‘Purgeable Paradox’ section via specified quora url.
'Complete' (albeit brief) paper: http://www.academia.edu/13808157/Consciencia_Aequatio