[–] dogma1138 9y ago ↗ not anymore / not for me. [–] nalllar 9y ago ↗ Still seeing it here. [–] throwaway2016a 9y ago ↗ Same. Still seeing it. [–] dogma1138 9y ago ↗ Just checked it, Google.co.uk says it's fine, Google.com says might be infected.Chrome doesn't give out the malicious site warning on the redirect on either.
[–] nalllar 9y ago ↗ Still seeing it here. [–] throwaway2016a 9y ago ↗ Same. Still seeing it. [–] dogma1138 9y ago ↗ Just checked it, Google.co.uk says it's fine, Google.com says might be infected.Chrome doesn't give out the malicious site warning on the redirect on either.
[–] throwaway2016a 9y ago ↗ Same. Still seeing it. [–] dogma1138 9y ago ↗ Just checked it, Google.co.uk says it's fine, Google.com says might be infected.Chrome doesn't give out the malicious site warning on the redirect on either.
[–] dogma1138 9y ago ↗ Just checked it, Google.co.uk says it's fine, Google.com says might be infected.Chrome doesn't give out the malicious site warning on the redirect on either.
[–] patcheudor 9y ago ↗ https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/diagn..."Not dangerousSafe Browsing has not recently seen malicious content on www.windowsphone.com."
[–] JonRB 9y ago ↗ I'm still seeing this - I wonder what their metric is for figuring out these things.
6 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 14.6 ms ] threadChrome doesn't give out the malicious site warning on the redirect on either.
"Not dangerous
Safe Browsing has not recently seen malicious content on www.windowsphone.com."