ClausIE: Clause-Based Open Information Extraction (gate.d5.mpi-inf.mpg.de) 24 points by aoldoni 9y ago ↗ HN
[–] aoldoni 9y ago ↗ Paper at https://people.mpi-inf.mpg.de/~rgemulla/publications/delcorr... [–] brudgers 9y ago ↗ Clausie homepage: https://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/departments/databases-and-informa...
[–] brudgers 9y ago ↗ Clausie homepage: https://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/departments/databases-and-informa...
[–] nl 9y ago ↗ A while ago, I tested Stanford's Core NLP Open IE implementation and UW (now AllenAII)'s version[1]. The UW version was much better.The paper for this make it look pretty good compared to that. I'll be trying it.[1] https://github.com/allenai/openie-standalone [–] vmorgulis 9y ago ↗ I found a Stanford Parser jar file in the sources of ClauseIE.http://nlp.stanford.edu:8080/parser/index.jsp [–] jhzab 9y ago ↗ I came to the same conclusion. OTOH OpenIE is around 4x slower than CoreNLP and the memory requirements can also be a problem (~4GB JVM heap space).I would be really interested on how ClausIE stacks up to that.ClausIE also seems to be using CoreNLP _and_ OpenNLP.
[–] vmorgulis 9y ago ↗ I found a Stanford Parser jar file in the sources of ClauseIE.http://nlp.stanford.edu:8080/parser/index.jsp
[–] jhzab 9y ago ↗ I came to the same conclusion. OTOH OpenIE is around 4x slower than CoreNLP and the memory requirements can also be a problem (~4GB JVM heap space).I would be really interested on how ClausIE stacks up to that.ClausIE also seems to be using CoreNLP _and_ OpenNLP.
5 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 26.5 ms ] threadThe paper for this make it look pretty good compared to that. I'll be trying it.
[1] https://github.com/allenai/openie-standalone
http://nlp.stanford.edu:8080/parser/index.jsp
I would be really interested on how ClausIE stacks up to that.
ClausIE also seems to be using CoreNLP _and_ OpenNLP.