As I've said before, every time a new "eevann fasterr!!!111!!" version of Chrome [for Android] is released:
What's the point of making incremental speed improvements to the browser whilst continuing the policy of not supporting plugins [eg. a good ad blocker]? On most sites, any gains in page rendering times are more than offset by the additional burden of downloading all the additional trackers, adverts, etc.
Until Chrome for android supports plugins, I'll continue to use Firefox across all my devices, even though I prefer Chrome on the desktop.
They weren't required to run Chrome 46 on older version of Windows 10 on Surface Book as the video clearly says test was run in 2015 under video. I will object that it is a cumulative effect of Widows 10 (+ driver updates) and Chrome improvements. So Google has cheated again and took credits of others hard work.
2 comments
[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 19.2 ms ] threadWhat's the point of making incremental speed improvements to the browser whilst continuing the policy of not supporting plugins [eg. a good ad blocker]? On most sites, any gains in page rendering times are more than offset by the additional burden of downloading all the additional trackers, adverts, etc.
Until Chrome for android supports plugins, I'll continue to use Firefox across all my devices, even though I prefer Chrome on the desktop.