I link to the reddit discussion instead of the pdf of the retraction, because there is a lot more information and discussion there. Hopefully the HN ranking algorithm doesn't punish this too much.
Thanks for posting the Reddit link : I hadn't previously realised that the quality of the commentary in /r/MachineLearning was so high.
I came across your link I had "check the real-ness of SARM" on my TODO list (along with the v1 of the PDF on my reader). Now to try and parse through what was real about the method and what was hubris...
2 comments
[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 17.7 ms ] threadI came across your link I had "check the real-ness of SARM" on my TODO list (along with the v1 of the PDF on my reader). Now to try and parse through what was real about the method and what was hubris...