What an idiotic argument. It's been proven again and again that electronic voting machines have shit security and can be hacked. Maybe not over the Internet, but Russia is not the one and only danger as the NYT seems to think it is.
We shouldn't argue that voting machines are vulnerable, because that would "sow doubt"? Fuck off, NYT! By that logic voting machines should never be audited either, because that could also "sow doubt" about their integrity if people see them being analyzed.
This election has proven to me that NYT has no integrity left, and would support whatever argument "its camp" supports, regardless of the facts, and Washington Post is basically the Breitbart of the left now.
2 comments
[ 4.9 ms ] story [ 20.1 ms ] threadWe shouldn't argue that voting machines are vulnerable, because that would "sow doubt"? Fuck off, NYT! By that logic voting machines should never be audited either, because that could also "sow doubt" about their integrity if people see them being analyzed.
This election has proven to me that NYT has no integrity left, and would support whatever argument "its camp" supports, regardless of the facts, and Washington Post is basically the Breitbart of the left now.