How much sense does it make to use one search engine's traffic to gauge usage of another's? Anyone with ask.com as their home page / default is not counted.
If you extend alexa timeline to the max, you see a large spike at the end of 08 that drops dramatically in January of 09 and it's relatively flat from mid 09 to now.
But search engine technology, with a few caveats, generally works across different languages and markets without too much work. It isn't really possible for NYT or CNN to just translate themselves into a 20 popular languages easily.
Does anyone know if google gives users the ability to block entire domains from their search results? This is a feature that would benefit not only google, but also reedit, digg, and hacker news dare I say. I would block ask.com in a heartbeat.
16 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 53.6 ms ] threadThe graph shows the relative amounts of people who use Google to search for (i.e. navigate to) Ask, NYT, and CNN.
So, if toolbar spam is involved, it's Google's toolbar.
Hmm. I just checked with quantcast, and the graphs are similar: http://www.quantcast.com/ask.com http://www.quantcast.com/nytimes.com http://www.quantcast.com/cnn.com
also it gives an estimate of 110M visitors per month. Not too shabby.
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ask.com%2F%3F...
http://grab.by/3LyC
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=ask.com,+nytimes.com,+cn...
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=ask.com,+nytimes.com,+cn...
It's a little amazing that iwon is gaining in market share...
I've been using Quantcast to do these types of comparisons. Is there an advantage to Google Trends over Quantcast?