Apple’s holding a Mac event on October 27th: “hello again” (theverge.com) 23 points by javiercr 9y ago ↗ HN
[–] exabrial 9y ago ↗ Good god, please don't don't remove any more ports. [–] mmagin 9y ago ↗ Well, you don't need to charge your laptop and listen to headphones at the same time, do you? [–] blacksmith_tb 9y ago ↗ BT headphones, of course - perhaps they'll embrace wireless charging, too, and get it over with. Now if the portless machine gained IP67, I might be more willing to consider it... [–] exabrial 9y ago ↗ I have three driver molded IEMs for critical listening... If I'm practicing guitar to a backing track, Bluetooth is worthless because of latency. [–] nicky0 9y ago ↗ Prepare yourself to get outraged.
[–] mmagin 9y ago ↗ Well, you don't need to charge your laptop and listen to headphones at the same time, do you? [–] blacksmith_tb 9y ago ↗ BT headphones, of course - perhaps they'll embrace wireless charging, too, and get it over with. Now if the portless machine gained IP67, I might be more willing to consider it... [–] exabrial 9y ago ↗ I have three driver molded IEMs for critical listening... If I'm practicing guitar to a backing track, Bluetooth is worthless because of latency.
[–] blacksmith_tb 9y ago ↗ BT headphones, of course - perhaps they'll embrace wireless charging, too, and get it over with. Now if the portless machine gained IP67, I might be more willing to consider it... [–] exabrial 9y ago ↗ I have three driver molded IEMs for critical listening... If I'm practicing guitar to a backing track, Bluetooth is worthless because of latency.
[–] exabrial 9y ago ↗ I have three driver molded IEMs for critical listening... If I'm practicing guitar to a backing track, Bluetooth is worthless because of latency.
5 comments
[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 28.3 ms ] thread