11 comments

[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 36.7 ms ] thread
> Four different interviews with me were submitted to The Paris Review. These were patched together to form a single interview, which was shown to me. This scheme worked only fairly well, so I called in yet another interviewer to make it all of a piece. I was that person. With utmost tenderness, I interviewed myself.
Don't ruin it for those who read the comments first!
I think by definition the comments sections is implicitly a spoiler section. Those who read it first get what they came for :)
I'll just add that this is well worth the read. I'd go so far as to say it's an inspirational piece. More upvotes. More hacker hacks.
I don't know. I found it really superficial and trite, with absolutely no insight whatsoever.

I really don't get why Vonnegut is so popular. He seems pretty talentless to me.

Which of his novels have you read? Have you read Slaughterhouse-Five, Deadeye Dick or Breakfast of Champions?
(comment deleted)
His gift was to tell a story in a way that both entertained and informed. His paragraphs invoked both interest and caused me to think about the world in a different way. I'll attach a snippet from Slaughterhouse Five, where Vonnegut describes a bombing raid, except chooses to do so in reverse.

“It was a movie about American bombers in World War II and the gallant men who flew them. Seen backwards by Billy, the story went like this: American planes, full of holes and wounded men and corpses took off backwards from an airfield in England. Over France, a few German fighter planes flew at them backwards, sucked bullets and shell fragments from some of the planes and crewmen. They did the same for wrecked American bombers on the ground, and those planes flew up backwards to join the formation.

The formation flew backwards over a German city that was in flames. The bombers opened their bomb bay doors, exerted a miraculous magnetism which shrunk the fires, gathered them into cylindrical steel containers , and lifted the containers into the bellies of the planes. The containers were stored neatly in racks. The Germans below had miraculous devices of their own, which were long steel tubes. They used them to suck more fragments from the crewmen and planes. But there were still a few wounded Americans though and some of the bombers were in bad repair. Over France though, German fighters came up again, made everything and everybody as good as new.

When the bombers got back to their base, the steel cylinders were taken from the racks and shipped back to the United States of America, where factories were operating night and day, dismantling the cylinders, separating the dangerous contents into minerals. Touchingly, it was mainly women who did this work. The minerals were then shipped to specialists in remote areas. It was their business to put them into the ground, to hide them cleverly, so they would never hurt anybody ever again.”

really good read, here's a snippet of vonnegut's sharp wit re Dresden bombing:

--- VONNEGUT

I said that only one person on the entire planet benefited from the raid, which must have cost tens of millions of dollars. The raid didn’t shorten the war by half a second, didn’t weaken a German defense or attack anywhere, didn’t free a single person from a death camp. Only one person benefited—not two or five or ten. Just one.

INTERVIEWER

And who was that?

VONNEGUT

Me. I got three dollars for each person killed. Imagine that.

What an incredible writer, with this piece just reinforcing it. Vonnegut has expressed more feelings, described the world more clearly, and opened my mind more widely than any other author. I remember reading Slaughterhouse Five (the first time) during high school, then again nearly every year since. His descriptions of and thoughts on Dresden in the book and this interview really show his outlook on the war.