As with many arguments that hinge on a perceived hypocrisy or an interpretation of someone else's motives, this is all a little lacking.
The only exception that these folks allow is that workers (other than themselves; the AAUP functions as a union to some extent) should not be unionized at their own university and/or that the university should not have to pay what already-unionized workers are demanding.
It'd be pretty inauthentic if people who support the existence of labor unions believe their workers or community members shouldn't unionize.
On the other hand, nobody is under obligation to automatically pay whatever unionized workers are demanding. That wouldn't even be a negotiation, and negotiation is what unions are for. That some strikes are overreach and won't receive universal support isn't some kind of argument against the existence of labor unions. The reality tends to be a lot more subtle.
This seems odd due to the fact that the Great Father in Washington already gave us all affordable health care via the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”), signed into law by President Obama in 2010.
9 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 13.3 ms ] threadLook at articles in the student newspaper:
"More than 100 Harvard Faculty Signed Petition to Support Strike" http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/10/25/faculty-letter-...
"Hundreds of Students Leave Class to Support HUDS Strike" http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/10/18/huds-supporters...
The only exception that these folks allow is that workers (other than themselves; the AAUP functions as a union to some extent) should not be unionized at their own university and/or that the university should not have to pay what already-unionized workers are demanding.
It'd be pretty inauthentic if people who support the existence of labor unions believe their workers or community members shouldn't unionize.
On the other hand, nobody is under obligation to automatically pay whatever unionized workers are demanding. That wouldn't even be a negotiation, and negotiation is what unions are for. That some strikes are overreach and won't receive universal support isn't some kind of argument against the existence of labor unions. The reality tends to be a lot more subtle.
Greenspun's rhetoric is an embarrassment.