Yeah, I posted an edit within an hour after posting the original article - I hadn't read the further takes mentioning that the lookups were A records. I'd only read the comments in a Reddit thread, where people were saying they couldn't understand what the article was describing.
EDIT: I've withdrawn the article. When it comes to the facts presented therein, to borrow a phrase, what was good wasn't new, and what was new wasn't good.
2 comments
[ 2.0 ms ] story [ 12.7 ms ] threadRead http://blog.erratasec.com/2016/11/debunking-trumps-secret-se... for the actual story.
EDIT: I've withdrawn the article. When it comes to the facts presented therein, to borrow a phrase, what was good wasn't new, and what was new wasn't good.