[–] jjs 16y ago ↗ Nice-looking language, but not-so-nice looking license proliferation: http://www.falconpl.org/index.ftd?page_id=license_1_1
[–] yawniek 16y ago ↗ comment failed, wrong number of arguments.no, seriously,whats wrong with gpl? [–] jjs 16y ago ↗ no, seriously,whats wrong with gpl?Don't ask me; ask the guy who came up with the "FPLL" dual-licensing.LGPL single-licensing would probably be better.
[–] jjs 16y ago ↗ no, seriously,whats wrong with gpl?Don't ask me; ask the guy who came up with the "FPLL" dual-licensing.LGPL single-licensing would probably be better.
[–] [dead] Parabola 16y ago ↗ Admittedly I didn't read it all, but it looks like Python with syntactic sugar...
4 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 20.4 ms ] threadno, seriously,whats wrong with gpl?
Don't ask me; ask the guy who came up with the "FPLL" dual-licensing.
LGPL single-licensing would probably be better.