Show HN: Oh, hi Mark – Chrome extension aiming to end the bookmarks nightmare (chrome.google.com) 4 points by harijoe 9y ago ↗ HN
[–] tedmiston 9y ago ↗ I'm a little concerned by the 653 KB file size. Is that due to assets? [–] harijoe 9y ago ↗ This weight is mostly explained by the dependencies. Oh, hi Mark! relies notably on elasticlunr as a search engine and unfluff to scrape saved pages. There is definitely space for optimization here, but I chose to rather focus on features until now. [–] prashnts 9y ago ↗ Fuse.js could be a better alternative for elasticlunr.js.[1] http://fusejs.io/ [–] harijoe 9y ago ↗ I didn't know it. It seems indeed very powerful. I will try it and if it is as fast as elasticlunr, use it. Thanks :-) [–] tedmiston 9y ago ↗ Totally makes sense. Keep up the good work!
[–] harijoe 9y ago ↗ This weight is mostly explained by the dependencies. Oh, hi Mark! relies notably on elasticlunr as a search engine and unfluff to scrape saved pages. There is definitely space for optimization here, but I chose to rather focus on features until now. [–] prashnts 9y ago ↗ Fuse.js could be a better alternative for elasticlunr.js.[1] http://fusejs.io/ [–] harijoe 9y ago ↗ I didn't know it. It seems indeed very powerful. I will try it and if it is as fast as elasticlunr, use it. Thanks :-) [–] tedmiston 9y ago ↗ Totally makes sense. Keep up the good work!
[–] prashnts 9y ago ↗ Fuse.js could be a better alternative for elasticlunr.js.[1] http://fusejs.io/ [–] harijoe 9y ago ↗ I didn't know it. It seems indeed very powerful. I will try it and if it is as fast as elasticlunr, use it. Thanks :-)
[–] harijoe 9y ago ↗ I didn't know it. It seems indeed very powerful. I will try it and if it is as fast as elasticlunr, use it. Thanks :-)
5 comments
[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 24.0 ms ] thread[1] http://fusejs.io/