And of course they did. Remiss in their duty had they not. What was the point? It was not impossible to tell as the article claims. He's an enabler. They need to know if he is getting special information or had any special relationships with other persons of interest, especially foreign intelligence services. The internet is media. Media persons have always been surveillance targets for their , by definition, outsize ability to influence the population. You think other contemporary "media magnates" are not also "selectors"? Living in a dream world, Neo.
3 comments
[ 41.7 ms ] story [ 182 ms ] thread