Ask HN: Co-founder mom died, and his depression is effecting the business
We're a team of 3. One of the guys lost their mom earlier this year, and bouts of grief and depression have taken hold of him.
His productivity and work quality has nosedived. He's uncooperative, non-communicative, and is often absent.
I've tried to understand what he's going through, and I've talked about it with him. I've suggested he take some time off (which he doesn't want to do).
He's adamant he wants to continue, and he's seeking help from a counselor.
This has been going on for ~4 months, and it's really taken a toll on our business. The 3rd co-founder and I find it demotivating and frustrating when he disappears.
I feel as if the best thing for the business is to let go of him, but it's a shitty thing to do. Moreover – I feel as if his depression would worsen if he lost his place in the team.
I'm not an experienced manager.
Is there anybody on here who has successfully dealt with depressed employees/co-founders?
Edit: spelling
16 comments
[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 32.1 ms ] threadYes, I know of one well-known company which gave one of its core team members an unlimited leave of absence (with a believable promise that they'd be welcome to come back any time in the next 2 years). The key aspect here is that this was a small-ish, (then) family-run company -- and in many ways, the team was like family, too. Also, this was well before the current hyper-accelerated "My startup's growth plan über alles" ethos that we have today -- so even aside from the family-run aspect, people at least did generally have some perspective on the human side of things (unlike today).
I feel as if the best thing for the business is to let go of him, but it's a shitty thing to do.
Absolutely. Definitely don't just fire the guy. (Aside from being a shitty thing to do -- I'm assuming it's abundantly clear already that there's a significant chance that could backfire in ways that could hurt the company far beyond the current loss of productivity).
But (absent an actual, forced leave of absence) it may be a good idea to ply him with a significant amount of paid leave (4+ months), with a suggestion that he put aside any idea of working full-time for quite a bit longer than that -- plus a statement that he's not only welcome, but very strongly encouraged to re-apply at any time after 6 (given that it's basically too complicated legally to outright promise someone a position will be available for them in the future, given the way business conditions usually go -- which I'm sure he can understand, in his current condition).
Things happen in life, and sometimes you just have to do the right thing.
I don't have any recommendations for which action to take next. But do try to speak to him honestly and open up to each other as deeply as you can not only to find out what action you should take next, but to come to a decision together.
This seems like a bigger issue to me than the one in your subject.
His disappearance should not affect the validity of your vision and the validity of the opportunity.
If his disappearance is demotivating this is a sign that your motivation needs work.
If you fire him something else will replace him as the conditional hook that will trigger the demotivation.
You can fire him or keep him. But your reason should not be that his presence is demotivating.
Or rather if this is your reason you will find yourself demotivated anyway, regardless of what you do.
At the very least, you should minimize information related to the time-frame and size of your team.
I would start getting palpitations followed by dangerously high blood pressure. Touch wood, nothing major happened to me and I'm back to normal life.
If you guys can cooperate with him and give him the time, I'm sure he will come back to leading a normal productive life.
Like someone suggested, give him an indefinite leave of absence and have him work with therapists and recover fully.
- the cap table.
- the depressed founder's role in the company.
- the make up of the rest of the team.
- the articles of incorporation.
Without this information, there is no way that you can know if a hard sell, like you propose, will backfire.
Business decisions, particularly those involving major personal losses and ensuing mental illness, never happen in a vacuum. Advising a hard sell is extremely irresponsible.
From a business standpoint, it's an unlucky break. From a personal standpoint it's a profound tragedy for your cofounder. If the business is viable this won't be the last encounter with bad luck. How this one is handled will set the company culture.
My random advice from the internet:
1. Google up "grieving process". You won't discover how to fix it because there ain't no fixing it. It might help you understand what your cofounder is going through and suggest constructive ways to help.
2. The tragedy effects all three of you. That's why there's demotivation and frustration. Group counseling might be a way to work through the current situation. Relationships are one the things that counseling strengthens.
3. Reframing your coworker's condition as grieving rather than depressed puts it in the right light. It acknowledges the proximate cause and places the sadness within a timeline. More importantly it recognizes that the condition is not pathological or a mental disorder. It's simply a healthy part of the human condition.
4. Suppose you and the other founder kick out the grieving cofounder. Afterwards, there's still just the two of you. It is nice to imagine that the business would be in the same shape that it's in now. But it won't be. It will have gone through the distraction and disruption of removing a founder. On top of the disruption and distraction that the death has already caused.
5. Ultimately the business decision is whether to lawyer up or to team up. I hate sports analogies, but here one would be managing a squad where someone has blown out an ACL. The person can usually return to full fitness but it takes time.
Good luck.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Wolpaw#Personal_Life
> He's adamant he wants to continue, and he's seeking help from a counselor.
He's doing the right thing, both in seeking counsel and in wanting to continue. Taking time off is extremely unlikely to help him.
Grieving affects everyone differently.
Whether you are a start-up or an established small business, chances are the bulk of your value is in your management / founding team. That means the three of you, working together as a team.
> The 3rd co-founder and I find it demotivating and frustrating when he disappears.
That is your problem, not his.
> I feel as if the best thing for the business is to let go of him, but it's a shitty thing to do. Moreover – I feel as if his depression would worsen if he lost his place in the team.
Wrong priorities. If you're not looking after your team you're not looking after your company. Help the guy first and foremost.
Give him honest support, don't complain, take up the slack, man up and swallow the frustration. It may well be you going through a rough patch next time.
These things suck but it's part of life (and business).
Your startup is really insignificant compared to losing a loved one.
I'm interested to know what he said when you communicated to him that the two of you find him uncooperative and that you feel he is holding you and the project up.
This has the potential to make your team stronger. This a good example of an exception where this particular co-founder should come first over you, or the project.
I don't think it's unreasonable to put a timeframe around this, so you don't enable and he doesn't exploit the situation. I think that's closer to the 12 month mark than the 4 month mark.